H.R. 2

H.R. 2 (100th): Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987

Enacted — Veto Overridden Glenn Anderson (D) HOUSE_BILL — 100th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987, also known as H.R. 2, is a comprehensive transportation bill that provides funding and guidelines for various highway and transportation programs in the United States from 1987 to 1990. It authorizes the use of the Highway Trust Fund for projects such as the Federal-aid Interstate-Primary program, bridge replacement, highway safety, and more. The bill includes provisions for the maintenance and improvement of highways, bridge rehabilitation, and the development of transportation infrastructure in U.S. territories. It also establishes guidelines for the relocation of utilities and the handling of displaced persons due to federal projects. Additionally, it amends the Urban Mass Transportation Act to provide funding for mass transit projects, including rail modernization and bus facilities. The bill emphasizes environmental considerations, such as the planting of native wildflowers along highways, and supports disadvantaged business enterprises by setting aside contracts for them. It also addresses issues related to toll roads, safety enhancements, and disaster relief funding.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage of H.R. 2 has highlighted its comprehensive approach to improving the nation's transportation infrastructure. The bill has been praised for its significant investment in highway safety and modernization, which is expected to enhance travel safety and efficiency across the country. The inclusion of provisions for mass transit funding is seen as a positive step towards reducing traffic congestion and promoting environmentally friendly transportation options. Additionally, the bill's support for disadvantaged business enterprises is viewed as a progressive move to promote economic equity.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 2 have pointed out potential shortcomings in its funding allocations, arguing that the distribution of resources may not adequately address the needs of all regions equally. Some media outlets have expressed concerns over the environmental impact of increased highway construction, despite the bill's efforts to incorporate environmental considerations. There is also criticism regarding the complexity of the bill, which some believe could lead to bureaucratic challenges in implementation and oversight. Additionally, the extension of certain taxes related to the Highway Trust Fund has faced opposition from those who view it as an unnecessary financial burden.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$67,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

Based on the available data, there appears to be no direct conflict of interest between the sponsor's donors and the subject matter of the bill. The top donor industries for Glenn Anderson are Retired, Securities & Investment, and Government, none of which directly overlap with the subject matter of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987. Furthermore, the lobbying activity in this bill's policy area does not involve any of Anderson's top donors. Therefore, there is no evidence of a money trail that could suggest a conflict of interest. It is important for voters to understand that while campaign finance can sometimes influence legislative decisions, in this case, there is no apparent conflict.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CHIME FINANCIAL, INC. CHIME FINANCIAL, INC. $650,000
QVC GROUP, INC. QVC GROUP, INC. $280,000
NOZAN JAAFAR MUSTAFA AND SHEIKH JAAFAR MUSTAFA HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP $270,000
TRANE TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY LLC (FKA INGERSOLL RAND TRANE AMERICAN STANDARD) TRANE TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY LLC (FKA INGERSOLL RAND, TRANE, AMERICAN STANDARD) $110,000
NATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY DAVID A. BRADLEY $61,500
COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY - CMC COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY - CMC $60,000
NEOVOLTA INC. FGS GLOBAL (US) LLC (FKA FGH HOLDINGS LLC) $60,000
AMERICAN BENEFITS COUNCIL OBO ALLIANCE TO FIGHT FOR HEALTH CARE SPANGLER STRATEGIES LLC $50,000
K&L GATES LLP ON BEHALF OF THE PACKAGE COALITION LLC MCHUGH LEMAY ASSOC., LLC $40,000
CARL ZEISS AG FGS GLOBAL (US) LLC (FKA FGH HOLDINGS LLC) $40,000
SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION SONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SACHSE, ENDRESON & PERRY, LLP $25,000
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION SPANGLER STRATEGIES LLC $20,000
AMERICAN BENEFITS COUNCIL SPANGLER STRATEGIES LLC $20,000
NEXTOP, INC. CHM LLC DBA ATLAS COMMUNITY STUDIOS $15,030
MAIN STREET SPORTS GROUP DBA FANDUEL SPORTS NETWORK HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Glenn Anderson, ranked by total contributions.

Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0
Securities & Investment $15,000,000
Individuals: $15,000,000 PACs: $0
Government $15,000,000
Individuals: $15,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)