S. 1142

S. 1142: Scarper Ridge Golden Gate National Recreation Area Boundary Adjustment Act

Passed Senate Alejandro Padilla (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The S. 1142: Scarper Ridge Golden Gate National Recreation Area Boundary Adjustment Act likely proposes adjustments to the boundaries of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, specifically around the Scarper Ridge area. This could involve expanding or redefining the current boundaries to include more land for conservation, recreation, or other purposes.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage that is positive about the bill likely highlights the potential benefits of expanding the Golden Gate National Recreation Area. This could include increased conservation efforts, protection of natural habitats, enhanced recreational opportunities for the public, and potential boosts to local tourism and economies.

Negative Media Summary

Negative media coverage might focus on concerns such as potential land use conflicts, the impact on private landowners if land is incorporated into the recreation area, and possible increased costs or resource allocation for managing the expanded area. There might also be criticism regarding the process of how the boundary adjustments are decided and implemented.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

There are no direct industry overlaps detected between the subjects of the bill S. 1142: Scarper Ridge Golden Gate National Recreation Area Boundary Adjustment Act and the top donor industries of its sponsor, Alejandro Padilla. This means that the industries that contribute the most to Padilla's campaign do not appear to have a direct stake in the legislation he is sponsoring. Furthermore, the lobbying activity in this bill's policy area does not indicate any potential conflicts of interest. The disclosed lobbying amounts total $162,545, but none of these disclosed amounts can be directly linked to Padilla's donors. Therefore, based on the available data, there is no evidence to suggest a conflict of interest in this case.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AMERICAN COLLEGE OF GASTROENTEROLOGY $67,545
HRP GROUP, LLC BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $60,000
ETSY PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES $45,000
REVVITY, INC. REVVITY, INC. $35,000
AMERICARBON SUNDAY CREEK HORIZONS, LLC $20,000
APPALACHIAN CHILDREN COALITION SUNDAY CREEK HORIZONS, LLC $10,000
MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM SUNDAY CREEK HORIZONS, LLC $10,000
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP OBO MEDEXPERT INTERNATIONAL, INC. NET CENTRIC ALLIANCE LLC undisclosed
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP OBO INVACARE AMERICA NET CENTRIC ALLIANCE LLC undisclosed
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP OBO EPTURA, INC. NET CENTRIC ALLIANCE LLC undisclosed
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP OBO WELLHIVE NET CENTRIC ALLIANCE LLC undisclosed
JUVENILE PRODUCT MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (JPMA) ASSOCIATION HEADQUARTERS undisclosed
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP OBO BEEP, INC. NET CENTRIC ALLIANCE LLC undisclosed
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP OBO BRUNO INDEPENDENT LIVING AIDS,INC NET CENTRIC ALLIANCE LLC undisclosed
TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026