S.Con.Res. 33 is a concurrent resolution that outlines the U.S. federal government's budget for fiscal year 2026 and sets budgetary guidelines for the years 2027 through 2035. It includes recommendations for federal revenues, spending, deficits, and public debt. The resolution provides instructions for certain congressional committees to propose legislation that would increase the deficit by no more than $70 billion over this period. It also establishes reserve funds for adjustments related to reconciliation legislation and policies on immigration enforcement and border security. Additionally, it sets procedures for budget enforcement and emergency spending.
Media outlets that support S.Con.Res. 33 highlight its structured approach to long-term fiscal planning, praising the resolution for setting clear budgetary goals and providing a framework for managing federal spending and revenues. They also commend the inclusion of reconciliation instructions as a means to expedite legislative processes, allowing for more efficient decision-making. Supporters appreciate the focus on immigration and border security, viewing it as a necessary step to address ongoing national concerns.
Critics of S.Con.Res. 33 argue that the resolution's provision to allow a $70 billion increase in the deficit is fiscally irresponsible, especially given the current national debt levels. Some media outlets express concern over the emphasis on immigration enforcement and border security, suggesting that it may prioritize these areas over other critical issues such as healthcare and education. Additionally, there is skepticism about the effectiveness of the reconciliation process, with worries that it could limit thorough debate and consideration of important legislative measures.
There is a significant overlap between the sponsor's donors and the bill's subject matter. The Securities & Investment industry, which has donated $195,000,000 to the sponsor, is directly affected by the bill's subject matter of economics and public finance. Additionally, there is substantial lobbying activity in this bill's policy area, with several entities including NEXANS NORWAY AS, STEPTOE LLP, and the Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands, among others, lobbying undisclosed amounts. The total disclosed lobbying amount in this bill's policy area is $151,000. Given these financial connections, there is a high risk of potential conflicts of interest.
These industries are both affected by this bill and among the sponsor's top donors.
| Industry | Match Type | Related Subject | Donations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Securities & Investment (F10) | Sector | Economics and Public Finance | $195,000,000 |
| Total from overlapping industries | $195,000,000 | ||
Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.
| Client | Lobbying Firm | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| LIBERTY MARITIME CORPORATION | WINSTON & STRAWN LLP | $230,000 |
| AMERICAN COALITION FOR ETHANOL | AMERICAN COALITION FOR ETHANOL | $180,000 |
| GOVERNMENT OF THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS | WINSTON & STRAWN LLP | $130,000 |
| FAIRBANKS MORSE, LLC | LIGHTHOUSE POINT GOVERNMENT RELATIONS | $50,000 |
| STEPTOE LLP (FKA STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP) | MALONEY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, LLC | $15,000 |
| TAI ENGINEERS, LLC | LIGHTHOUSE POINT GOVERNMENT RELATIONS | $15,000 |
| BAYOU METAL SUPPLY | LIGHTHOUSE POINT GOVERNMENT RELATIONS | $10,000 |
| IDEAL ELECTRIC POWER CO | LIGHTHOUSE POINT GOVERNMENT RELATIONS | $7,500 |
| DELTA HEALTH | MR. JOE MIKLOSI | $6,000 |
| WRAY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | MR. JOE MIKLOSI | $6,000 |
| NEXANS NORWAY AS | WINSTON & STRAWN LLP | undisclosed |
| LINCOLN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL & CARE CENTER | MR. JOE MIKLOSI | undisclosed |
| ONE WORLD SURGERY | MR. JOE MIKLOSI | undisclosed |
| DR. WILLARD'S PLANT CATALYST (PLANTCATALYST) | MR. JOE MIKLOSI | undisclosed |
| GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT | GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT | undisclosed |
Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026
Top industries funding Lindsey Graham, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)