H.R. 10215

H.R. 10215: To prohibit certain noncompete agreements, and for other purposes.

Introduced Scott Peters (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

Summary coming soon. We're still gathering details on this bill.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage summary coming soon.

Negative Media Summary

Media coverage summary coming soon.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$1,260,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Committee
Unknown

The analysis of H.R. 10215, sponsored by Scott Peters, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The primary donor industries include Health Professionals, contributing a substantial $960 million, and Retired individuals, contributing $300 million. However, these industries do not have a direct correlation with the prohibition of noncompete agreements, which primarily affects employment and labor relations rather than healthcare or retirement sectors. As such, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal, given the lack of financial incentives tied to the bill's provisions. Voters should be aware that while large donations can raise concerns about influence, in this case, the absence of overlap suggests that the bill is unlikely to serve the interests of the sponsor's top donors directly.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Scott Peters, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $960,000,000
Individuals: $960,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $300,000,000
Individuals: $300,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us