The Smart Meter Data Privacy Protection Act (H.R. 10284) is a proposed law introduced on September 3, 2026, by Representative Josh Riley (D-NY) and co-sponsored by Representative Mike Kennedy (R-UT). The bill aims to protect consumers' electricity usage data collected by smart meters. It prohibits certain state-regulated electric utilities from using, selling, or sharing this data for commercial purposes unless it's necessary for specific operational functions like billing, outage management, grid reliability, regulatory compliance, or customer-approved programs. Utilities are required to submit annual reports to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) detailing their data collection and usage practices. If a utility violates these rules, it must credit affected customers' bills with three times the revenue earned from the improper use, and it cannot pass these costs onto consumers. The FTC is empowered to enforce these regulations and establish data security and retention standards. Additionally, state attorneys general can take legal action to protect residents, and the bill allows states to implement stronger privacy protections if they choose.
Supporters of the Smart Meter Data Privacy Protection Act commend its efforts to enhance consumer privacy by restricting the commercial use of personal electricity consumption data. They highlight the bill's bipartisan sponsorship as a positive step toward safeguarding sensitive information. The requirement for utilities to report data practices to the FTC and the establishment of penalties for violations are seen as strong measures to ensure compliance and protect consumer rights. Additionally, the bill's provision allowing states to enact stronger privacy laws is viewed favorably, as it empowers local governments to provide even greater protections for their residents.
Critics of the Smart Meter Data Privacy Protection Act express concerns that the bill's restrictions could hinder innovation and the development of new services that rely on smart meter data. They argue that limiting the use of this data may prevent utilities and third-party companies from offering energy efficiency programs and other beneficial services to consumers. Some also worry that the enforcement mechanisms, such as the requirement for utilities to credit customers' bills for violations, could lead to increased operational costs for utilities, which might ultimately be passed on to consumers in other ways. Additionally, there is apprehension that the bill's focus on state-regulated utilities not wholly owned by U.S. persons may create inconsistencies in data privacy protections across different regions.
The Smart Meter Data Privacy Protection Act, sponsored by Josh Riley, does not exhibit any direct industry overlaps with his top donor industries, which include Health Professionals and Retired individuals. The total contributions from these sectors amount to $157,500,000, with a significant portion coming from individual donations rather than PACs. Given that the bill focuses on data privacy related to smart meters, it does not intersect with the interests of these donor industries, which primarily relate to health and retirement sectors. As such, there is minimal risk of conflicts of interest arising from the financial support received by the sponsor.
Voters should be aware that while the sponsor has received substantial funding from specific industries, the absence of direct ties between those industries and the bill's subject matter suggests that the legislation is unlikely to be influenced by donor interests. This indicates a lower risk of legislative bias or conflict of interest, allowing for a more transparent legislative process regarding data privacy protections.
Top industries funding Josh Riley, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)
