H.R. 10286

H.R. 10286: To require certain publicly funded stadiums to limit the price of concessions sold to patrons, and for other purposes.

Introduced Hillary Scholten (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 10286, introduced by Rep. Hillary Scholten on September 3, 2026, aims to make food and drinks more affordable at large, publicly funded sports stadiums. The bill requires these stadiums to cap concession prices at no more than 7% above the local market rate for similar items. It also encourages stadiums to offer concession opportunities to small businesses and prohibits charging them extra fees just for the right to sell food and drinks. The Federal Trade Commission would enforce these rules, treating violations as unfair business practices.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 10286 argue that it will make attending sports events more affordable for fans by preventing price gouging on concessions. They also highlight the bill's support for small businesses, providing them with better opportunities to operate within large venues without facing prohibitive fees.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the bill contend that it imposes undue government interference in private business operations, potentially leading to financial challenges for stadiums that rely on concession revenues. They also express concerns that the price caps could result in reduced quality or variety of food and beverage options available to patrons.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Committee
UNKNOWN

The analysis of H.R. 10286, which aims to limit concession prices at publicly funded stadiums, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Hillary Scholten's top donor industries. Scholten's primary financial support comes from health professionals, contributing a total of $240 million, and retired individuals, contributing $75 million. Since neither of these industries is directly related to the subject matter of the bill, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. Voters should be aware that while the bill addresses consumer pricing in sports venues, the financial backing for the sponsor does not stem from stakeholders who would be directly impacted by this legislation. Therefore, the risk of undue influence from donor interests is low, as there is no evident financial incentive for the sponsor to act contrary to the public interest regarding this bill.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Hillary Scholten, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us