H.R. 10310

H.R. 10310: To direct the Federal Trade Commission to revise the regulations regarding the “do-not-call” registry to prohibit politically-oriented recorded message telephone calls to telephone numbers listed on that registry.

Introduced Virginia Foxx (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 10310 is a bill that aims to direct the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to update the regulations surrounding the 'do-not-call' registry. Specifically, it seeks to prohibit political organizations from making recorded message telephone calls to individuals who have registered their numbers on this list, thereby providing greater protection for consumers from unsolicited political calls.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 10310 argue that the bill is a necessary step to protect consumers from intrusive political messaging, particularly during election seasons. Many view it as a way to enhance privacy rights and reduce the volume of unwanted calls, which can be especially burdensome for those who have opted out of such communications through the do-not-call registry.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 10310 contend that the bill could hinder political engagement and outreach efforts, especially for smaller political campaigns that rely on recorded messages to reach voters. Some argue that it may limit free speech and the ability of political entities to communicate their messages effectively, potentially disenfranchising voters who might benefit from such outreach.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$472,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Committee
UNKNOWN

The analysis of H.R. 10310, which aims to revise the regulations regarding the 'do-not-call' registry, shows no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Virginia Foxx's top donor industries. The primary donor industries are Health Professionals, contributing $360 million, and Retired individuals, contributing $112.5 million. Since these industries do not have a direct stake in the regulation of politically-oriented recorded message telephone calls, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. The lack of PAC contributions further suggests that the financial influence may not be tied to organized political interests that could sway the bill's outcome. Voters should be aware that while the financial backing is substantial, it does not directly correlate with the subject matter of the bill, indicating a low risk of conflict.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Virginia Foxx, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $360,000,000
Individuals: $360,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $112,500,000
Individuals: $112,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us