The Sunset Section 230 Act likely proposes to repeal or phase out Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which provides legal immunity to online platforms for content posted by their users. This means that social media companies and other online platforms could be held liable for the content shared on their sites, potentially leading to significant changes in how these platforms operate and moderate content.
Supporters of the Sunset Section 230 Act argue that it promotes accountability among online platforms, encouraging them to take more responsibility for harmful content and misinformation. They believe that this could lead to a safer online environment and foster a more responsible digital landscape.
Critics of the Sunset Section 230 Act warn that repealing or sunseting Section 230 could stifle free speech and innovation on the internet. They express concerns that without legal protections, platforms may overly censor content to avoid liability, which could lead to a chilling effect on open discourse and limit the diversity of opinions available online.
All donors are from Applied Materials, Inc., a technology company. There is no direct link between the donors and the bill to repeal Section 230, which primarily affects internet platforms. The risk is low due to the lack of direct connection between the donors' industry and the bill's subject matter.
Top industries and organizations funding Mark DeSaulnier, from FEC data.
Source: FEC campaign finance records
