H.R. 10349

H.R. 10349: To amend the Public Health Service Act to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish a Public Safety Mental Health Fellowship Program, and for other purposes.

Introduced Derek Tran (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 10349 aims to amend the Public Health Service Act to create a Public Safety Mental Health Fellowship Program. This program would likely focus on enhancing mental health services and support for public safety personnel, such as police officers and firefighters, by providing training and resources to address mental health challenges in these professions.

Positive Media Summary

Media outlets have praised H.R. 10349 for its proactive approach to addressing the mental health needs of public safety workers. Supporters argue that the fellowship program could lead to better mental health outcomes for those in high-stress jobs, ultimately benefiting communities by improving public safety and reducing instances of burnout and mental health crises among first responders.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 10349 have expressed concerns about the potential for the program to divert funding from other essential mental health services. Some media reports highlight fears that the focus on public safety personnel might overshadow broader mental health needs in the general population, leading to inequities in mental health resource distribution.

Conflict of Interest Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$100
PAC Percentage
0%
Committee
UNKNOWN

All donors are from Applied Materials, Inc., a company not directly related to public health or mental health services. The risk of conflict of interest is low as the bill focuses on public safety mental health, which does not align with the donors' industry.

Top PAC Donors to Sponsor

Top industries and organizations funding Derek Tran, from FEC data.

HALLIDAY, ROBERT $577
DEANE, TIMOTHY $346
DICKERSON, GARY $288

Source: FEC campaign finance records

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us