H.R. 2631

H.R. 2631 (105th): Disapproval bill

Enacted — Veto Overridden Joseph Skeen (R) HOUSE_BILL — 105th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 2631 is a bill that seeks to overturn the President's decision to cancel funding for 38 military construction projects that were initially approved in the Military Construction Appropriations Act of 1998. This bill expresses disapproval of the President's use of the line item veto to eliminate these specific appropriations.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 2631 argue that the bill is crucial for ensuring that vital military infrastructure projects receive the necessary funding. They emphasize that these projects are essential for national security and supporting the needs of military personnel. Positive media coverage highlights the bill as a necessary check on executive power, ensuring that important legislative decisions are not unilaterally overturned.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 2631 contend that the bill undermines the President's ability to manage the federal budget effectively by using the line item veto to eliminate what he deems unnecessary spending. Negative media coverage suggests that the bill represents congressional overreach and hampers efforts to reduce wasteful government spending. Some commentators argue that it sets a precedent for challenging executive decisions, potentially leading to increased political gridlock.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$67,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

Based on the available data, there appears to be a low risk of conflict of interest between Representative Joseph Skeen's campaign donors and the subject matter of H.R. 2631. The top donor industries for Representative Skeen are Retired, Securities & Investment, and Government, none of which directly overlap with the bill's subject matter. Furthermore, there is no evidence of significant lobbying activity from these industries in relation to this bill. It is important for voters to be aware that while there may not be a direct overlap, the influence of money in politics can be complex and indirect. However, based on the information at hand, there is no clear conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CHIME FINANCIAL, INC. CHIME FINANCIAL, INC. $650,000
QVC GROUP, INC. QVC GROUP, INC. $280,000
NOZAN JAAFAR MUSTAFA AND SHEIKH JAAFAR MUSTAFA HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP $270,000
TRANE TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY LLC (FKA INGERSOLL RAND TRANE AMERICAN STANDARD) TRANE TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY LLC (FKA INGERSOLL RAND, TRANE, AMERICAN STANDARD) $110,000
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS OBO COALITION AGAINST SURPRISE MEDICAL BILLING SPANGLER STRATEGIES LLC $80,000
ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP (ON BEHALF OF OF VAST INC.) FGS GLOBAL (US) LLC (FKA FGH HOLDINGS LLC) $80,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF TRANSPLANTATION POLSINELLI PC $60,000
AMERICAN BENEFITS COUNCIL OBO ALLIANCE TO FIGHT FOR HEALTH CARE SPANGLER STRATEGIES LLC $50,000
EMERGENT BIOSOLUTIONS THE NICKLES GROUP, LLC $40,000
K&L GATES LLP ON BEHALF OF THE PACKAGE COALITION LLC MCHUGH LEMAY ASSOC., LLC $40,000
CARL ZEISS AG FGS GLOBAL (US) LLC (FKA FGH HOLDINGS LLC) $40,000
SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION SONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SACHSE, ENDRESON & PERRY, LLP $25,000
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION SPANGLER STRATEGIES LLC $20,000
STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE SONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SACHSE, ENDRESON & PERRY, LLP undisclosed
SPIRIT LAKE TRIBE SONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SACHSE, ENDRESON & PERRY, LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Joseph Skeen, ranked by total contributions.

Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0
Securities & Investment $15,000,000
Individuals: $15,000,000 PACs: $0
Government $15,000,000
Individuals: $15,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us