H.R. 7257

H.R. 7257: SECURE Grid Act

Passed House Robert Latta (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The SECURE Grid Act extends requirements for state energy security plans until 2031. States must submit these plans to the Department of Energy (DOE) to qualify for federal funding for energy conservation. The DOE is not required to approve these plans but must offer assistance to states in developing and revising them. The new requirements include addressing weather threats, supply chain risks for electricity equipment, and the security of local energy distribution systems. Additionally, the Government Accountability Office will report on how effective these state plans are.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the SECURE Grid Act highlight its proactive approach to strengthening energy security in the face of climate change and supply chain vulnerabilities. They praise the bill for encouraging states to enhance their energy infrastructure and for providing necessary federal assistance, which could lead to more robust and resilient energy systems across the country.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the SECURE Grid Act express concerns that the lack of required DOE approval for state energy security plans could lead to inconsistencies in how states address energy vulnerabilities. Some argue that the bill may not go far enough in ensuring comprehensive security measures are implemented, potentially leaving states ill-prepared for significant energy disruptions.

Conflict of Interest Analysis
7/10
Risk Level
High
Total Donations
$100
PAC Percentage
100%
Committee
UNKNOWN

All donors are employees of Applied Materials, Inc., which may have a vested interest in the SECURE Grid Act. This concentration of donations from a single company suggests a high risk of conflict of interest.

Top PAC Donors to Sponsor

Top industries and organizations funding Robert Latta, from FEC data.

HALLIDAY, ROBERT $385
DEANE, TIMOTHY $231
DICKERSON, GARY $192

Source: FEC campaign finance records

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us