The H.R. 8247 bill is aimed at setting up an interagency group that will focus on categorical exclusions. This suggests that the goal is to create a collaborative team from different agencies to work on issues that are exempted from certain rules or regulations for various reasons.
Supportive media outlets highlight the potential for increased efficiency and collaboration between governmental agencies. They argue that the creation of an interagency group could lead to better coordination and understanding of categorical exclusions, leading to more effective and streamlined decision-making processes. They also suggest that this could reduce bureaucratic red tape and potentially lead to faster implementation of policies.
Critics in the media express concerns about the potential for increased bureaucracy and lack of transparency that may come with the creation of an interagency group. They argue that this could lead to confusion and inefficiency, with multiple agencies potentially having conflicting interests. Additionally, some outlets express concern that categorical exclusions may be used to bypass important regulatory checks and balances, potentially leading to negative consequences.
Based on the data provided, there is no direct overlap between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill H.R. 8247. The sponsor, Josh Gottheimer, has received significant donations from the Retired, Securities & Investment, and Government sectors. However, none of these industries appear to be directly impacted by the bill. Additionally, there is no evidence of lobbying activity from these industries in relation to this bill's policy area. Therefore, the risk of a conflict of interest is low. It's important for voters to understand that while money does play a significant role in politics, in this case, there is no clear connection between the sponsor's financial support and the legislation he is sponsoring.
Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.
| Client | Lobbying Firm | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| BEER INSTITUTE | BEER INSTITUTE | $1,250,000 |
| SKYWATER TECHNOLOGY FOUNDRY | SKYWATER TECHNOLOGY FOUNDRY | $250,000 |
| NATIONAL WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION | WATER STRATEGIES, LLC | $180,000 |
| HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED | HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED | $177,777 |
| PREMIUM CIGAR ASSOCIATION | PREMIUM CIGAR ASSOCIATION | $70,000 |
| VALERO ENERGY CORP. | ROBERTI GLOBAL (F/K/A ROBERTI WHITE, LLC) | $50,000 |
| ANIMAL HEALTH INSTITUTE | ANIMAL HEALTH INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| SHORELIGHT, LLC (FKA SHORELIGHT EDUCATION, LLC) | SHORELIGHT, LLC (FKA SHORELIGHT EDUCATION, LLC) | $48,700 |
| DENALI WATER SOLUTIONS | WASHINGTON ADVOCACY GROUP | $15,000 |
| CENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE LENDING | NANCY ZIRKIN | $10,000 |
| AMGEN INC. | WASHINGTON ADVOCACY GROUP | $10,000 |
| PUERTO RICAN CULTURAL CENTER | FDJ SOLUTIONS, LLC | $6,000 |
| ALIANZA FOR PROGRESS ON BEHALF OF POWER4PR (FKA OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATION) | FDJ SOLUTIONS, LLC | $5,000 |
| BLACKSTONE CONSTRUCTION LLC | WASHINGTON ADVOCACY GROUP | undisclosed |
| EAVES LAW FIRM, LLC | FDJ SOLUTIONS, LLC | undisclosed |
Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026
Top industries funding Josh Gottheimer, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)