H.R. 8527

H.R. 8527: To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to designate animal shelters as essential community facilities eligible for direct loans and grants, and for other purposes.

Introduced Jefferson Shreve (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8527 is a bill that proposes an amendment to the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act. The amendment aims to classify animal shelters as essential community facilities. This classification would make animal shelters eligible to receive direct loans and grants under the Act, potentially providing them with financial assistance for their operations and development.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8527 have praised the bill for recognizing the important role that animal shelters play in communities. By designating them as essential facilities, the bill could provide much-needed financial support, enabling shelters to improve their services, expand capacity, and better care for animals. This move is seen as a progressive step towards supporting animal welfare and addressing the needs of rural and underserved areas.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8527 might argue that the bill could divert funds from other critical rural development needs, such as infrastructure or healthcare. There may also be concerns about the allocation of federal resources and whether this designation could prioritize animal shelters over other community facilities that also require assistance. Additionally, some might question the criteria for eligibility and the oversight of how the funds are utilized by animal shelters.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

Upon analysis of the bill H.R. 8527 and its sponsor Jefferson Shreve's top donor industries, no direct overlaps were detected. This suggests that the sponsor's decision to propose this bill is not directly influenced by his top donors. Moreover, the lobbying activity in this bill's policy area does not seem to have a direct connection with the sponsor's donors. The largest lobbying amount came from Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners Inc., with a total of $210,000, but there is no clear link between this entity and the bill's subject matter or the sponsor's donors. Therefore, based on the available data, the risk of conflicts of interest appears to be low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS $1,160,000
COPENHAGEN INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS INC. COPENHAGEN INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS INC. $210,000
SOLENO THERAPEUTICS, INC. SOLENO THERAPEUTICS, INC. $80,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER $80,000
THE AMHERST GROUP, LLC THE MAJORITY GROUP, LLC $60,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATORS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATORS $31,407
MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA WEST & WEST, LLC $24,300
STEELSHIPS, LLC CONSCIENCE POINT CONSULTING, INC. $20,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL $18,000
VIPO US CORUS FEDERAL STRATEGIES $10,000
DRONEUP JLF CONSULTING CO $10,000
BLACK KNIGHT MEDICAL, LLC JLF CONSULTING CO $7,500
NATIONAL AIR CARRIER ASSOCIATION NATIONAL AIR CARRIER ASSOCIATION undisclosed
TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS undisclosed
CAPITOL COUNSEL, LLC ON BEHALF OF BAYER CORPORATION MICHAEL R. PAWLOWSKI undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jefferson Shreve, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us