H.R. 8635

H.R. 8635: To modernize and improve the accuracy, timeliness, and interoperability of the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program, and for other purposes.

Introduced Jefferson Shreve (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8635 aims to update and enhance the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program, which is used to verify the immigration status of individuals applying for public benefits. The bill seeks to improve the accuracy and speed of this verification process and ensure that the system can effectively communicate with other relevant databases.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8635 have praised the bill for its potential to streamline the verification process, which could lead to more efficient administration of public benefits. Advocates argue that modernizing the SAVE program will help ensure that resources are allocated appropriately and that only those eligible receive government assistance.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8635 have expressed concerns that the modernization of the SAVE program could lead to increased barriers for eligible individuals seeking public benefits. Some worry that the emphasis on accuracy and interoperability may inadvertently result in delays or errors that could deny support to those in need, particularly among vulnerable populations.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

The analysis of H.R. 8635, which aims to modernize the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program, shows no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Jefferson Shreve's top donor industries. The lobbying activity related to this bill primarily involves natural resources and educational institutions, which do not directly correlate with the immigration verification focus of the bill. The largest contributions come from Parker Meggitt, who donated $100,000, but there is no clear link between his interests and the bill's objectives. Overall, the lack of direct connections between donor interests and the bill's content suggests a low risk of conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
TENCENT AMERICA LLC JOHN MCENTEE $225,000
AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATION AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATION $180,000
PARKER MEGGITT PARKER MEGGITT $100,000
GUIDESTAR ELDERCARE LOPER CONSULTING LLC $40,000
GERSHOW RECYCLING CORPORATION BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $30,000
PACE UNIVERSITY BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $30,000
NATURA RESOURCES BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $20,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $20,000
TOSHIBA CORPORATION BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $18,000
AUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION IKON PUBLIC AFFAIRS $18,000
MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION IKON PUBLIC AFFAIRS $18,000
NATIONAL RETIREE LEGISLATIVE NETWORK ALYSON PARKER $15,000
TOWN OF CLARKSTOWN BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $10,000
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI TWO RIVERS LLC $6,000
JOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION CARTER LAWS & ASSOCIATES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jefferson Shreve, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us