H.R. 8638

H.R. 8638: To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Washington Spy Ring National Historic Trail, and for other purposes.

Introduced Thomas Suozzi (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8638 aims to amend the National Trails System Act to officially designate a new trail known as the Washington Spy Ring National Historic Trail. This trail would likely commemorate the historical significance of the Washington Spy Ring during the American Revolutionary War, highlighting the role of espionage in achieving independence.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has generally praised the bill for recognizing the importance of historical espionage and its role in American history. Supporters argue that the trail will educate the public about the contributions of spies to the Revolutionary War effort and promote tourism and historical awareness in the areas associated with the trail.

Negative Media Summary

Critics have raised concerns that designating a new national historic trail may divert funds and attention from other pressing conservation and infrastructure needs. Some have questioned the necessity of commemorating the Washington Spy Ring, suggesting that it may not resonate with the broader public or reflect the values of contemporary society.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

There appears to be no direct conflict of interest between the sponsor's donors and the bill's subject matter. The sponsor, Thomas Suozzi, receives the majority of his campaign funding from Health Professionals and Retired individuals, which do not directly overlap with the subject matter of the bill, H.R. 8638, which pertains to the National Trails System. Additionally, the lobbying activity in this bill's policy area is primarily from various Native American tribes and a veterans' collective, none of which are among the sponsor's top donors. Therefore, based on the available data, there is no evidence of a financial conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY PACE, LLP $65,000
FEDERATED INDIANS OF THE GRATON RANCHERIA PACE, LLP $60,000
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS PACE, LLP $60,000
CATAWBA INDIAN NATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA PACE, LLP $60,000
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH INDIANS PACE, LLP $60,000
QUAPAW NATION PACE, LLP $50,000
CA STATE ASSEMBLY PACE, LLP $50,000
NOTTAWASEPPI HURON BAND OF THE POTAWATOMI PACE, LLP $40,000
PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS PACE, LLP $35,000
PENOBSCOT NATION PACE, LLP $30,000
COLUSA INDIAN COMMUNITY PACE, LLP $30,000
KARUK TRIBE PACE, LLP $20,000
NAPA VALLEY VINTNERS ASSOCIATION PACE, LLP $20,000
BISHOP PAIUTE TRIBE PACE, LLP $20,000
WEST LOS ANGELES VETERANS' COLLECTIVE PACE, LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Thomas Suozzi, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us