H.R. 8787

H.R. 8787: To prohibit the Secretary of Defense from contracting with retailers who use covered payment processing equipment, systems, or services, and for other purposes.

Introduced Ben Cline (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8787 aims to prevent the Secretary of Defense from entering into contracts with retailers that utilize certain types of payment processing equipment, systems, or services deemed 'covered.' This legislation is likely intended to address concerns about security, privacy, or compliance with specific standards in payment processing.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8787 argue that the bill enhances national security by ensuring that the Department of Defense only works with retailers that meet strict payment processing standards. Advocates believe this will protect sensitive information and prevent potential cyber threats, fostering a safer environment for military personnel and their families.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8787 express concerns that the bill may limit the options available to the Department of Defense in selecting retail partners, potentially leading to increased costs or reduced competition. Some argue that the bill could inadvertently harm small businesses that rely on the covered payment processing systems, impacting their ability to serve military communities effectively.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$105,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The bill H.R. 8787 aims to prohibit the Secretary of Defense from contracting with retailers that use certain payment processing systems. The sponsor, Ben Cline, has significant financial backing from the health professionals industry, totaling $80 million, and from retired individuals, amounting to $25 million. However, there are no direct overlaps between these donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The lobbying activity related to this bill includes contributions from USIG Digital, which is also a donor to Cline, amounting to $30,000. While this connection exists, it does not directly relate to the core issues of the bill, indicating a low risk of conflict of interest. Voters should be aware that while there are financial connections, they do not directly influence the bill's intent or provisions.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area. 2 lobbying client(s) are also sponsor donors.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
USIG DIGITAL Also a Donor SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $15,000
USIG DIGITAL Also a Donor SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $15,000
THE GEO GROUP, INC. CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $80,000
COPPER.CO SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $36,000
AMPL-ACTION FUND (FORMERLY ADVOCATES FOR MULTI-USE OF PUBLIC LANDS) BIGHORN PUBLIC AFFAIRS GROUP $20,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
PVS CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ERIE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ARTPARK MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $10,500
MHG TELCO, LLL MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $10,500
ROSINA FOODS MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $9,000
THE SALVATION ARMY MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $6,000
A.C.E. CONSULTING A.C.E. CONSULTING DBA A.C.E. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING undisclosed
A.C.E. CONSULTING A.C.E. CONSULTING DBA A.C.E. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING undisclosed
THE GUTHRIE CLINIC BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Ben Cline, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us