H.R. 8790

H.R. 8790: To amend the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 to direct research, development, demonstration, and commercial application activities in support of next-generation geothermal and closed-loop geothermal systems in various conditions,

Reported by Committee Pat Harrigan (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8790 aims to update the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 by focusing on research, development, and practical applications of next-generation geothermal energy technologies. Specifically, it emphasizes closed-loop geothermal systems, which can operate under various environmental conditions, enhancing the potential for geothermal energy use across the United States.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8790 have praised the bill for promoting clean energy innovation and reducing reliance on fossil fuels. They argue that advancing geothermal technology could lead to significant environmental benefits and job creation in the renewable energy sector, positioning the U.S. as a leader in sustainable energy solutions.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8790 express concerns about the bill's feasibility and the potential for high costs associated with developing new geothermal technologies. Some argue that the focus on geothermal energy may divert resources from other renewable energy sources that could yield quicker results in combating climate change.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Energy

The analysis of H.R. 8790, which focuses on advancing geothermal energy systems, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Pat Harrigan's top donor industries. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes contributions from various entities, such as Amgen Inc. with a $5,000 donation and Grand Pharmaceutical Group Ltd with $90,000. However, these contributions do not directly relate to geothermal energy or the specific technologies outlined in the bill. As a result, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal, as the financial interests of the donors do not align with the objectives of the legislation. Voters should be aware that while there are significant contributions from various industries, they do not pose a direct conflict with the bill's focus on geothermal energy.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
GRAND PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP LTD (FKA EAST OCEAN MEDICAL (HONG KONG) LIMITED) CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $90,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION DOUBLE HAUL STRATEGIES LLC $9,000
AMGEN INC. WASHINGTON ADVOCACY GROUP $5,000
FUEL ETHANOL DISRUPTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER INCORPATED MR. AMIR GOULART SCHARIF undisclosed
FUEL ETHANOL DISRUPTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER INCORPATED MR. AMIR GOULART SCHARIF undisclosed
BLACKSTONE CONSTRUCTION LLC WASHINGTON ADVOCACY GROUP undisclosed
DENALI WATER SOLUTIONS WASHINGTON ADVOCACY GROUP undisclosed
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYER ORGANIZATIONS (NAPEO) ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP undisclosed
RROMA COUNCIL RROMA COUNCIL undisclosed
BAJO COHEN AGLIANO, P.A. ON BEHALF OF HEALTH EDGE INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC BALLARD PARTNERS undisclosed
ERUDIO BIO, INC. BALLARD PARTNERS undisclosed
THE LOUIS D. BRANDEIS CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER LAW THE LOUIS D. BRANDEIS CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER LAW undisclosed
CELLIGENCE LLC BALLARD PARTNERS undisclosed
PENN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. BALLARD PARTNERS undisclosed
COMMUNITY BANK ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC COMMUNITY BANK ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Pat Harrigan, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us