H.R. 8797

H.R. 8797: To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize cooperative partnerships for mineral extraction activities at Army organic industrial base facilities, and for other purposes.

Introduced Nathaniel Moran (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8797 aims to amend the U.S. Code to allow for cooperative partnerships between the Army and private entities for mineral extraction activities at Army organic industrial base facilities. This could facilitate the extraction of minerals that are essential for defense and manufacturing purposes, potentially enhancing the Army's operational capabilities and resource management.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8797 have highlighted the bill as a proactive step towards strengthening national security by ensuring a reliable supply of critical minerals. They argue that by leveraging partnerships with the private sector, the Army can improve efficiency and innovation in mineral extraction, which is essential for maintaining military readiness and reducing dependency on foreign sources.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8797 have raised concerns about potential environmental impacts associated with increased mineral extraction activities. Some environmental advocates argue that the bill could lead to harmful practices and neglect the ecological consequences of mining operations near Army facilities. Additionally, there are worries about prioritizing resource extraction over community welfare and sustainable practices.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 8797, which focuses on mineral extraction activities at Army facilities, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Nathaniel Moran's top donor industries. While there is significant lobbying activity in the mineral extraction policy area, the disclosed amounts from the lobbying entities are largely undisclosed, making it difficult to ascertain direct financial influence. The only specific amount noted is $120,000 from CEDIA, which does not directly relate to mineral extraction. Therefore, the risk of conflicts of interest appears low as there is no clear financial incentive linking the sponsor's donors to the bill's subject matter.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CEDIA CEDIA $120,000
MINIMED GROUP, INC. MEHLMAN CONSULTING, INC. undisclosed
TUSK/MONTGOMERY PHILANTHROPIES, INC. DAKOTA STRATEGIES, LLC (F/N/A ODNEY, INC.) undisclosed
HYPERLIQUID POLICY CENTER HYPERLIQUID POLICY CENTER undisclosed
MODIVCARE BUYER, LLC MEHLMAN CONSULTING, INC. undisclosed
RED MOUNTAIN LAND PRESERVERS MEHLMAN CONSULTING, INC. undisclosed
KNOA PHARMA LLC MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
HELIX DEFENSE CROSS POTOMAC CONSULTING LLC undisclosed
NEW MOUNTAIN CAPITAL, L.L.C. MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS THE RABEN GROUP undisclosed
SUR HOLDINGS BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
GLOBAL KRATOM COALITION BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP ON BEHALF OF CURATIVE INC. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
KING'S DAUGHTERS MEDICAL CENTER BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
KING & SPALDING LLP ON BEHALF OF HINDALCO INDUSTRIES LIMITED BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Nathaniel Moran, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us