H.R. 8808

H.R. 8808: To amend title 46, United States Code, to expand the Cable Security Fleet to not less than 6 vessels, and for other purposes.

Introduced Max Miller (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8808 aims to amend U.S. law to increase the number of vessels in the Cable Security Fleet to at least six. This fleet is likely involved in securing undersea cable infrastructure, which is vital for telecommunications and internet connectivity.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8808 have praised the bill for enhancing national security by ensuring a robust fleet dedicated to protecting critical undersea infrastructure. They argue that a larger Cable Security Fleet will help safeguard against potential threats and ensure reliable communication networks.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8808 have raised concerns about the costs associated with expanding the Cable Security Fleet. Some argue that the bill may divert funds from other important areas or that it may not address the underlying vulnerabilities in the nation's telecommunications infrastructure effectively.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 8808, sponsored by Max Miller, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill aims to expand the Cable Security Fleet, which does not appear to directly benefit any specific donor industries. However, there is notable lobbying activity in the policy area, with the County of Los Angeles contributing $20,000 and Curio contributing $10,000. The undisclosed amounts from other entities raise some questions about potential influence, but without specific industry overlaps, the risk remains low. Voters should be aware of the lobbying presence but can be reassured that no direct financial interests are evident from the sponsor's donors.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SYNGENTA CORPORATION CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $140,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPRO NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPRO $85,660
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TORRES CONSULTING, LLC $20,000
CURIO CURIO $10,000
WILLOW LABORATORIES WILLOW LABORATORIES undisclosed
ECONOINVEST HOLDING LLC CORCORAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA CORCORAN PARTNERS undisclosed
FIELD TECH INTERNATIONAL CORP CORCORAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA CORCORAN PARTNERS undisclosed
SYNCHRON, INC. KING & SPALDING LLP undisclosed
GIFT-IN-KIND MARKETPLACE MICHAEL BEST STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
BROADBAND CONNECT B ARCHETYPE undisclosed
STELLAR DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION STELLAR DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION undisclosed
FONTAINEBLEAU DEVELOPMENT CORCORAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA CORCORAN PARTNERS undisclosed
CITY OF EL PASO FORWARD GLOBAL undisclosed
FOREST RIVER BUS, LLC CFM STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS (CONKLING FISKUM & MCCORMICK) undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL MINERALS CARLSBAD, LLC VALIANT STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Max Miller, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $560,000,000
Individuals: $560,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $175,000,000
Individuals: $175,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us