H.R. 8835

H.R. 8835: To amend chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, to maximize value of taxpayer dollars by providing regulatory relief for transit agencies, and for other purposes.

Introduced Hillary Scholten (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8835 aims to amend existing transportation laws to provide regulatory relief for transit agencies. The goal is to help these agencies use taxpayer money more effectively, potentially by reducing bureaucratic hurdles and streamlining processes involved in transit funding and operations.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8835 have praised the bill for its potential to enhance the efficiency of transit agencies, arguing that reducing regulations could lead to better service delivery and more effective use of taxpayer dollars. Advocates believe this legislation could improve public transportation infrastructure and encourage investment in transit systems.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8835 express concerns that loosening regulations could lead to a lack of accountability and oversight in transit operations. They argue that while the intent to maximize taxpayer value is commendable, it could result in diminished safety standards and reduced quality of service if not carefully implemented.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, there are notable lobbying activities in the transit and regulatory relief space. Specifically, BYD Motors, LLC and Paysafe Payment Processing Solutions LLC each contributed $20,000, indicating a vested interest in the outcomes of legislation that could impact transit agencies. The undisclosed lobbying activities from various entities, including Boyd Gaming Corporation and Vifcare, suggest potential influence in the regulatory landscape that could align with the interests of these donors. Voters should be aware that while the risk is not high, the presence of significant contributions from companies that may benefit from regulatory changes warrants scrutiny.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $140,000
QUECTEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS CO., LTD. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $90,000
CONNECTIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS MCDERMOTT+ LLC $60,000
CAMBER HEALTH MCDERMOTT+ LLC $50,000
BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES $20,000
PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC $20,000
BOYD GAMING CORPORATION POWERS PYLES SUTTER & VERVILLE, P.C. undisclosed
FREE FILE, INC. MR. STEPHEN M. RYAN undisclosed
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA - NUWEH MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
GREENPOWER BX LLC MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
CLARITY MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
ABRAWORKS LIMITED BURRELL INTERNATIONAL GROUP LLC undisclosed
THE PARTNERSHIP TO ADVANCE VIRTUAL CARE (PAVC) MCDERMOTT+ LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Hillary Scholten, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us