H.R. 9004

H.R. 9004: To require certain entities carrying out certain projects relating to the construction, reopening, and improvement of facilities to display certain public safety notices, and for other purposes.

Introduced Emilia Sykes (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9004 aims to mandate that specific entities involved in projects for constructing, reopening, or improving facilities must display public safety notices. This is intended to inform the public about safety measures and guidelines related to these projects.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9004 have praised the bill for enhancing public safety awareness and ensuring that communities are informed about ongoing construction and improvement projects. They argue that clear communication can help prevent accidents and promote safety during such activities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9004 have raised concerns about the potential burden it may place on entities required to display these notices. Some argue that the requirements could lead to unnecessary bureaucracy and increase costs for projects, potentially delaying important improvements to facilities.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 9004 indicates a low risk of conflicts of interest. The primary donor industries for sponsor Emilia Sykes are Health Professionals and Retired individuals, with significant contributions of $120 million and $37.5 million, respectively. However, there are no direct overlaps between these industries and the bill's focus on construction, reopening, and improvement of facilities. The lobbying activity in this area includes various entities, but none appear to directly connect to the sponsor's top donors or their interests. This suggests that while there is substantial financial backing from health professionals, it does not directly influence the legislative intent of this bill, which is more infrastructure-focused.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERDEGO AERO THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $200,000
PELION VENTURE PARTNERS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $38,000
REFORMING AMERICA'S TAXES EQUITABLY (RATE) SURROUND SOUND STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
ANELLO PHOTONICS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $30,000
SKYFRONT THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
47G THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
GRAIN CHAIN THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $5,000
SKYFRONT THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC undisclosed
ADNEURIS THERAPEUTICS, INC. MAD GLOBAL STRATEGY undisclosed
ALUCHEM INC. MAD GLOBAL STRATEGY undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
GPA MIDSTREAM ASSOCIATION SHUMAKER ADVISORS, LLC undisclosed
WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT DENNIS CARDOZA CONSULTING SERVICES undisclosed
INDUSTRIOUS GROUP INC. THORN RUN PARTNERS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Emilia Sykes, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us