H.R. 9030

H.R. 9030: To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to require assimilation likelihood screenings.

Introduced Nancy Mace (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9030 proposes to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to introduce screenings that assess the likelihood of immigrants assimilating into American culture. This likely involves evaluating factors such as language proficiency, cultural understanding, and social integration potential before granting immigration status.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9030 argue that the bill will help ensure that new immigrants can successfully integrate into American society, promoting social cohesion and shared values. Advocates believe that these screenings could lead to a more unified community and reduce cultural conflicts.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9030 contend that the bill could discriminate against certain groups of immigrants based on subjective criteria for assimilation. Opponents argue that it undermines the foundational principle of the U.S. as a nation of immigrants and could lead to increased barriers for those seeking a better life in America.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

The analysis of H.R. 9030, sponsored by Nancy Mace, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The primary focus of the bill is on immigration and assimilation likelihood screenings, which does not appear to be influenced by the financial interests of Mace's donors. The lobbying activity in this area is varied, with significant contributions from entities like Consejo Coordinador Empresarial, which has a $140,000 lobbying expenditure. However, this does not directly correlate to Mace's donor base or suggest a conflict of interest. Overall, the lack of direct financial ties to the bill's subject matter indicates a low risk for conflicts of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
FRESENIUS KABI USA LLC FRESENIUS KABI USA LLC $1,100,000
CONSEJO COORDINADOR EMPRESARIAL IQOM STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC $140,000
IVANHOE ATLANTIC (FORMERLY HIGH POWER EXPLORATION INC.) YORKTOWN SOLUTIONS $120,000
SKYRYSE, INC. SKYRYSE, INC. $70,000
AIS HEALTHCARE MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $20,000
THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC FOR CAPE FEAR PUBLIC UTILITY AUTHORITY,NC EARL STOCKDALE undisclosed
THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC ON BEHALF OF WEST COUNTY WASTEWATER DISTRICT, CA EARL STOCKDALE undisclosed
THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC FOR CITY OF OCEANSIDE CA EARL STOCKDALE undisclosed
THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC ON BEHALF OF WARD & SMITH (FOR BALD HEAD ISLAND) EARL STOCKDALE undisclosed
THE FERGUSON GROUP, LLC ON BEHALF OF WARD & SMITH, PA (FOR HOLDEN BEACH, NC) EARL STOCKDALE undisclosed
CORE POWER (US) INC. INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
ICON TECHNOLOGY, INC. INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
HUBBS-SEAWORLD RESEARCH INSTITUTE HAMMER ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
THE POLICY SHOP LLC JAVELIN ADVISORS LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF HEALTHCARE PURCHASER COALITIONS NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF HEALTHCARE PURCHASER COALITIONS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Nancy Mace, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $160,000,000
Individuals: $160,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $50,000,000
Individuals: $50,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us