H.R. 9036 is a bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives aimed at developing high-speed rail corridors across the United States. The bill proposes amendments to chapter 261 of title 49 of the United States Code to facilitate this development. Key provisions include allocating federal funding for the planning and construction of high-speed rail lines, establishing performance-based safety regulations for these projects, and promoting the use of advanced technologies to enhance the efficiency and safety of high-speed rail systems.
Media coverage has highlighted the bill's potential to revolutionize transportation in the U.S. by providing faster, more efficient travel options and reducing reliance on short-haul flights. Supporters argue that investing in high-speed rail could stimulate economic growth, create jobs, and contribute to environmental sustainability by decreasing carbon emissions associated with car and air travel.
Critics have raised concerns about the high costs associated with building and maintaining high-speed rail infrastructure. They question the feasibility of such projects given the vast geographic expanse of the U.S. and existing transportation preferences. Additionally, some media outlets have pointed out potential challenges in securing bipartisan support and the complexities involved in coordinating between federal, state, and local authorities.
The analysis of H.R. 9036, which focuses on high-speed rail corridor development, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Seth Moulton's top donor industries. While there is significant lobbying activity in the transportation sector, the specific donors listed, such as Summit Works USA and Monroe Energy, do not appear to have a direct financial interest in high-speed rail development. The total lobbying amounts from these entities are relatively modest, with Summit Works USA contributing $20,000 and Monroe Energy contributing $10,000. This lack of direct financial ties suggests that the risk of conflicts of interest is low. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not indicate a direct influence on the legislation from Moulton's donors.
Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.
| Client | Lobbying Firm | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $30,000 |
| SUMMIT WORKS USA | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $20,000 |
| FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $15,000 |
| MONROE ENERGY, LLC | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $10,000 |
| UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $10,000 |
| AGRI-MARK, INC | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF FATHER JUDGE HIGH SCHOOL, INC. | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | $6,000 |
| ARSENAL ASSOCIATES | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | undisclosed |
| LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | undisclosed |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | undisclosed |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | undisclosed |
| EKLUTNA, INC | EKLUTNA, INC. | undisclosed |
| CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | undisclosed |
| NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER | OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC | undisclosed |
Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026
Top industries funding Seth Moulton, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)
