H.R. 9037

H.R. 9037: To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to improve and expand electronic filing capabilities for Federal Aviation Administration Form 337, and for other purposes.

Introduced Troy Nehls (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9037 is a bill that aims to enhance and broaden the electronic filing capabilities for FAA Form 337, which is used for the application for approval of alterations to aircraft. The bill directs the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to improve the process, likely making it easier and more efficient for users to submit their applications electronically.

Positive Media Summary

Media outlets have praised H.R. 9037 for modernizing the FAA's processes, highlighting that improved electronic filing could lead to faster approvals and a more streamlined experience for aircraft owners and operators. The bill is seen as a step toward embracing technology in aviation regulation, which could enhance operational efficiency within the industry.

Negative Media Summary

Some critics have raised concerns about the potential for technical issues or cybersecurity risks associated with expanding electronic filing capabilities. There are worries that without adequate safeguards, sensitive information could be compromised. Additionally, some stakeholders feel that the bill may not address underlying issues in the FAA's regulatory framework that could be more pressing.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 9037 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor, Troy Nehls, and the bill's subject matter concerning the improvement of electronic filing capabilities for FAA Form 337. The top donor industries for Nehls do not intersect with the aviation sector, which suggests a lower likelihood of conflicts of interest. While there is lobbying activity in the aviation policy area, the amounts from specific lobbying groups do not indicate a direct financial influence on the bill's provisions. For instance, Summit Works USA contributed $20,000, but it is unclear how their interests align with the bill's objectives. Overall, the absence of overlapping donor industries and the limited financial influence from lobbyists contribute to a low risk assessment for conflicts of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
SUMMIT WORKS USA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
FRIENDS OF FATHER JUDGE HIGH SCHOOL, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $6,000
ARSENAL ASSOCIATES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Troy Nehls, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $200,000,000
Individuals: $200,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $62,500,000
Individuals: $62,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us