H.R. 9046

H.R. 9046: To require the Secretary of Defense to conduct a study on members of the Armed Forces who separated from the Armed Forces due to the mandate to receive the COVID-19 vaccine and the transfer of education benefits by such members, and for other

Introduced Tom Barrett (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9046 mandates the Secretary of Defense to conduct a study on service members who left the Armed Forces due to the COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The study will also look into the transfer of education benefits for those who separated under these circumstances.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9046 have praised the bill for addressing the concerns of service members affected by the COVID-19 vaccine mandate. They argue that understanding the impact of the mandate on military personnel is essential for future policy decisions and for ensuring that veterans receive their entitled benefits.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9046 have expressed concerns that the bill may undermine public health efforts and set a precedent for questioning vaccine mandates in the military. Some argue that it could distract from the broader goals of maintaining military readiness and protecting service members' health.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of H.R. 9046, there are significant lobbying activities in the defense and healthcare sectors that could raise concerns. Notably, Northrop Grumman, a major defense contractor, has contributed $60,000 through lobbying activities, which may have an indirect interest in the outcomes of military personnel policies. Additionally, UNUM Group, which has a vested interest in health insurance, contributed $170,000. This could suggest a potential influence on the bill's direction regarding the health implications of the COVID-19 vaccine mandate on service members. Voters should be aware that while direct conflicts are not evident, the financial ties to industries that could benefit from military health policies warrant scrutiny.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
UNUM GROUP UNUM GROUP $170,000
VIASAT, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $80,000
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $60,000
NEXT GLOBAL CAPITAL, INC. OBO WHITEFOX DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $60,000
STOLT TANKERS USA, INC. RIDGE PATH STRATEGIES $50,000
KALOGON, INC. SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
THE ALLIANCE FOR SECURE AI ACTION SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
STREET SMARTS VR SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
NATILUS SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
RENEW CAPITAL SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $20,000
PLUG POWER RIDGE PATH STRATEGIES $20,000
SMALL BUSINESS CONSULTING CORPORATION EAGLE POINT STRATEGIES LLC $15,000
OBJECT PHARMA EAGLE POINT STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
SLEVIN ADVISORY LLC O/B/O THE IFP ACTION RIDGE PATH STRATEGIES $10,000
BON SECOURS MERCY HEALTH (FORMERLY MERCY HEALTH) BON SECOURS MERCY HEALTH (FORMERLY MERCY HEALTH) undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Tom Barrett, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $160,000,000
Individuals: $160,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $50,000,000
Individuals: $50,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us