H.R. 9069

H.R. 9069: To limit the Department of Homeland Security from detaining children and individuals with a cognitive disability and to prohibit immigration enforcement actions at sensitive locations without a court-issued criminal warrant.

Introduced Joe Neguse (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9069 aims to restrict the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from detaining children and individuals with cognitive disabilities. Additionally, it seeks to prevent immigration enforcement actions from occurring at sensitive locations, such as schools and hospitals, unless there is a court-issued criminal warrant.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9069 have praised the bill for prioritizing the safety and well-being of vulnerable populations, particularly children and those with cognitive disabilities. Advocates argue that the legislation reflects a compassionate approach to immigration enforcement and protects individuals from unnecessary trauma.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9069 have expressed concerns that the bill could hinder immigration enforcement efforts and may allow individuals with criminal backgrounds to evade law enforcement. Some argue that the restrictions on enforcement actions could undermine public safety in sensitive locations.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

The analysis of H.R. 9069, which aims to limit the Department of Homeland Security's authority regarding the detention of children and individuals with cognitive disabilities, shows no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Joe Neguse's top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes contributions from various organizations, but none appear to have a direct financial interest in the bill's subject matter. For instance, Paratek Pharmaceuticals contributed $20,000, but their interests do not align with immigration enforcement or child detention issues. The total lobbying contributions from relevant organizations are not substantial enough to indicate a significant conflict of interest, suggesting that the bill's sponsorship is primarily driven by humanitarian concerns rather than donor influence.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
STEELSHIPS, LLC CONSCIENCE POINT CONSULTING, INC. $45,000
SAN PASQUAL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS THE FARLEY GROUP, INC. $30,000
PARATEK PHARMACEUTICALS PARATEK PHARMACEUTICALS $20,000
SAN JUAN SOUTHERN PAIUTE TRIBE THE FARLEY GROUP, INC. $15,000
CHURCH ALLIANCE K&L GATES, LLP $10,000
GIFDA RULON & WHITE GOVERNANCE STRATEGIES $10,000
ASSOCIATION FOR PROFESSIONALS IN INFECTION CONTROL AND EPIDEMIOLOGY ASSOCIATION FOR PROFESSIONALS IN INFECTION CONTROL AND EPIDEMIOLOGY undisclosed
PHARMATROPHIX, INC. FGS GLOBAL (US) LLC (FKA FGH HOLDINGS LLC) undisclosed
PGA TOUR, INC. FGS GLOBAL (US) LLC (FKA FGH HOLDINGS LLC) undisclosed
RESPONSIVE GOV ACTION THE RABEN GROUP undisclosed
KERECIS INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
BINTI, INC. INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
VERTIV GROUP CORPORATION AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
TERRA-GEN, LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
PHILIPS CONTINENTAL STRATEGY, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Joe Neguse, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us