H.R. 9102 seeks to amend the Defense Production Act of 1950 by redefining what constitutes 'prohibited technology' and 'notifiable technology'. This legislation likely aims to update the definitions to better address current technological advancements and national security concerns, ensuring that the U.S. can effectively manage and regulate critical technologies.
Supporters of H.R. 9102 argue that updating the definitions of prohibited and notifiable technologies is crucial for national security. They believe that the amendments will help the U.S. stay competitive in the global tech landscape and protect sensitive information from foreign adversaries, thereby enhancing the country's defense capabilities.
Critics of H.R. 9102 raise concerns that the redefinitions could lead to overregulation of emerging technologies, potentially stifling innovation and economic growth. Some fear that the changes may create ambiguity in compliance requirements, leading to unintended consequences for businesses and researchers in the tech sector.
All donations are from employees of Applied Materials, Inc., a company likely to be affected by changes in technology definitions under the Defense Production Act. This presents a high risk of conflict of interest.
Top industries and organizations funding John Moolenaar, from FEC data.
Source: FEC campaign finance records
