H.R. 9102 is a bipartisan bill introduced on June 2, 2026, by Representatives John Moolenaar (R-MI) and Debbie Dingell (D-MI). The bill aims to amend Title VIII of the Defense Production Act of 1950 by modifying the definitions of 'prohibited technology' and 'notifiable technology.' These changes are intended to update and clarify the categories of technologies that are either restricted or require notification under the Act, reflecting advancements and shifts in the technological landscape.
While specific media coverage on H.R. 9102 is limited, the bill's bipartisan sponsorship suggests a collaborative effort to address national security concerns related to emerging technologies. Supporters are likely to view the bill as a necessary step to modernize the Defense Production Act, ensuring that the United States remains vigilant and proactive in identifying and regulating technologies that could impact national security.
Critics may express concerns that the bill could lead to overregulation, potentially stifling innovation and placing undue burdens on technology companies. There might also be apprehension about the government's expanded role in defining and controlling technological development, raising questions about the balance between national security and economic growth.
While there are no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, the lobbying activity in the policy area raises some concerns. Notably, Tencent America LLC has engaged in significant lobbying with a reported expenditure of $410,000. This company operates in technology and digital sectors, which could intersect with the definitions of 'prohibited technology' and 'notifiable technology' being amended in H.R. 9102. Additionally, the Clean Freight Coalition and other transportation-related entities have also invested in lobbying efforts, indicating a potential interest in how these definitions might affect logistics and supply chains. Voters should be aware that while direct financial conflicts are not evident, the influence of large lobbying expenditures could shape the bill's outcomes in ways that favor specific industry interests.
Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.
| Client | Lobbying Firm | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| HOGAN LOVELLS, LLP OBO ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT CO., LTD. | MO STRATEGIES, INC. | $530,000 |
| TENCENT AMERICA LLC | MO STRATEGIES, INC. | $530,000 |
| TENCENT AMERICA LLC | HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP | $410,000 |
| BORDER TRADE ALLIANCE | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $60,000 |
| ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED | MO STRATEGIES, INC. | $60,000 |
| FRESH PRODUCE ASSOCIATION OF THE AMERICAS | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $45,000 |
| WERNER ENTERPRISES | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $45,000 |
| OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC. | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $45,000 |
| NATIONAL TANK TRUCK CARRIER, INC. | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $37,500 |
| STEVENS TRUCKING | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $30,000 |
| NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $22,500 |
| STARR-CAMARGO BRIDGE COMPANY | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $15,000 |
| STRAUNS CUSTOMHOUSE BROKERS, LLC | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $7,500 |
| CLEAN FREIGHT COALITION | MULLEN CONSULTING LLC | undisclosed |
| CITY OF ASHEBORO | CRANFILL SUMNER LLP | undisclosed |
Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026
Top industries funding John Moolenaar, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)
