H.R. 9111

H.R. 9111: To amend title 11 of the United States Code to stop abusive student loan collection practices in bankruptcy cases.

Introduced Shri Thanedar (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9111 aims to amend the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to prevent abusive practices related to the collection of student loans during bankruptcy proceedings. This legislation is likely intended to protect borrowers from aggressive collection tactics that can occur when they are seeking bankruptcy relief.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9111 have praised the bill for its potential to protect vulnerable borrowers from predatory collection practices. Advocates argue that it is a necessary step towards ensuring fairness in the bankruptcy process and providing relief for those overwhelmed by student loan debt.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9111 have raised concerns that the bill may hinder lenders' ability to recover funds and could lead to unintended consequences in the student loan market. Some argue that it may encourage irresponsible borrowing behavior by making it easier for borrowers to discharge student loan debt in bankruptcy.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.R. 9111, aimed at amending bankruptcy laws related to student loan collections, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Shri Thanedar's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donors primarily represent various sectors that do not directly influence student loan practices. While there is lobbying activity in the policy area, with significant contributions such as $20,000 from Summit Works USA and $10,000 from Monroe Energy, these entities do not appear to have a vested interest in student loan collection practices. Thus, the potential for conflicts of interest remains low, as the financial contributions do not correlate with the legislative intent of protecting borrowers from abusive practices.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
SUMMIT WORKS USA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
FRIENDS OF FATHER JUDGE HIGH SCHOOL, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $6,000
ARSENAL ASSOCIATES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Shri Thanedar, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us