H.R. 9119

H.R. 9119: To provide a prohibition on certain reductions to MQ-9 aircraft units, and for other purposes.

Introduced Brian Babin (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9119 is a bill aimed at preventing any reductions to the number of MQ-9 aircraft units. This suggests that the bill is intended to maintain or potentially increase the operational capacity of the MQ-9 drone program, which is used for surveillance and military operations.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9119 have praised the bill for ensuring that the U.S. maintains a robust fleet of MQ-9 aircraft, which are critical for national security and military readiness. They argue that these drones play an essential role in modern warfare and intelligence gathering.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9119 have expressed concerns that the bill may lead to unnecessary military spending and could divert resources from other important defense priorities. Some argue that maintaining the current number of MQ-9 units may not be justified given advancements in technology and changing military strategies.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$52,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The bill H.R. 9119 aims to prohibit reductions to MQ-9 aircraft units, which falls under defense and military spending. The top donor industries for sponsor Brian Babin are Health Professionals and Retired individuals, with no direct industry overlaps with the defense sector. The total contributions from these industries amount to $52,500,000, which does not indicate a financial interest in military contracts or defense appropriations. Additionally, while there is lobbying activity in the defense area, the sponsors' donors do not appear to be directly involved in this sector, suggesting a low risk of conflict of interest. Voters should be aware that while the bill is supported by significant funding from health and retirement sectors, it does not present a clear financial conflict with the bill's subject matter.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $140,000
QUECTEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS CO., LTD. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $90,000
CONNECTIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS MCDERMOTT+ LLC $60,000
CAMBER HEALTH MCDERMOTT+ LLC $50,000
BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES $20,000
PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC $20,000
FREE FILE, INC. MR. STEPHEN M. RYAN undisclosed
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA - NUWEH MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
GREENPOWER BX LLC MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
CLARITY MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
ABRAWORKS LIMITED BURRELL INTERNATIONAL GROUP LLC undisclosed
THE PARTNERSHIP TO ADVANCE VIRTUAL CARE (PAVC) MCDERMOTT+ LLC undisclosed
MBDA INCORPORATED MBDA INCORPORATED undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Brian Babin, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us