H.R. 9122

H.R. 9122: To amend the consumer product safety laws to repeal the exclusion of pistols, revolvers, and other firearms from the definition of consumer product under such laws.

Introduced Debbie Dingell (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9122 aims to change existing consumer product safety laws by removing the exemption that currently excludes firearms, such as pistols and revolvers, from being classified as consumer products. This means that firearms would be subject to the same safety regulations and standards that apply to other consumer goods.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9122 argue that including firearms in consumer product safety laws will enhance public safety by ensuring that firearms are manufactured and sold with appropriate safety standards. Advocates believe this could help reduce accidents and increase accountability among manufacturers.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9122 contend that this bill infringes on Second Amendment rights and could lead to unnecessary regulations that burden law-abiding gun owners and manufacturers. Opponents argue that the legislation could hinder access to firearms for responsible citizens and create confusion in the market.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Commerce

The analysis of H.R. 9122, which seeks to amend consumer product safety laws regarding firearms, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Debbie Dingell's top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area is largely focused on various sectors, including pharmaceuticals and defense, but does not appear to directly influence the bill's subject matter. For instance, while CEDIA has contributed $120,000, their focus is on consumer electronics rather than firearms legislation. The Friends Committee on National Legislation's $1,000,000 contribution is also not directly related to the firearms industry, indicating a lack of immediate financial conflict. Overall, the absence of significant financial ties between the sponsor's donors and the bill's content suggests a low risk of conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION $1,000,000
CEDIA CEDIA $120,000
HEARTFLOW, INC. HEARTFLOW, INC. $90,000
KNOA PHARMA LLC MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
HELIX DEFENSE CROSS POTOMAC CONSULTING LLC undisclosed
SUR HOLDINGS BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
GLOBAL KRATOM COALITION BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP ON BEHALF OF CURATIVE INC. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
ORCA BIO BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
IONQ, INC. IONQ, INC. undisclosed
LIFE360 EMERGENT STRATEGIES undisclosed
ZILLOW BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
TWENTY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. THE COMPLETE AGENCY undisclosed
CULTURAL CARE INC. KEEFE STRATEGIES LLC FKA KEEFE SINGISER PARTNERS undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FORENSIC NURSES POLSINELLI PC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Debbie Dingell, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us