H.R. 9123

H.R. 9123: To establish intelligence community funding restrictions on institutions of higher education that have a relationship with certain entities in the People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes.

Introduced Patrick Fallon (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9123 seeks to impose funding restrictions on higher education institutions in the United States that have partnerships or relationships with specific entities in China. The bill aims to ensure that U.S. intelligence community funding does not support institutions that may be linked to potential security threats from the People's Republic of China.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9123 argue that the bill is a necessary step to protect national security and prevent sensitive information from falling into the hands of foreign adversaries. Proponents highlight the importance of safeguarding U.S. research and education from foreign influence, especially in the context of rising tensions with China.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9123 express concerns that the bill could hinder academic collaboration and research opportunities with international partners. They argue that it may lead to unnecessary restrictions on educational institutions and could stifle innovation and diversity in research by isolating U.S. higher education from global networks.

Conflict of Interest Analysis
5/10
Risk Level
Medium
Total Donations
$50
PAC Percentage
100%
Committee
UNKNOWN

All donations are from employees of Applied Materials, Inc., a company that could be affected by policies on technology and international relations. The bill's focus on China-related educational restrictions may indirectly impact tech companies with interests in China.

Top PAC Donors to Sponsor

Top industries and organizations funding Patrick Fallon, from FEC data.

HALLIDAY, ROBERT $385
DICKERSON, GARY $288
DEANE, TIMOTHY $231

Source: FEC campaign finance records

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us