H.R. 9124

H.R. 9124: To provide for improvements in the treatment of detained persons, and for other purposes.

Introduced Bill Foster (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9124 aims to enhance the treatment of individuals who are detained, likely focusing on improving their living conditions, access to healthcare, and legal representation. The bill may also address regulations and standards for detention facilities to ensure the humane treatment of detained persons.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has highlighted the bill as a necessary step towards reforming the detention system, emphasizing the importance of humane treatment and the protection of human rights for all individuals, regardless of their legal status. Advocates for social justice and human rights have praised the bill for addressing long-standing issues in detention facilities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9124 argue that the bill may impose unnecessary regulations on detention facilities, potentially leading to increased costs and operational challenges. Some have expressed concerns that the bill could be seen as promoting leniency towards individuals who are detained, which may not resonate well with certain segments of the public.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

The analysis of H.R. 9124, which focuses on the treatment of detained persons, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Bill Foster's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The lobbying activity related to this bill primarily involves contributions from various entities, including GRAIN CHAIN and VERDEGO AERO, which do not have a clear connection to the treatment of detained persons. The total lobbying amounts from these entities are significant, with VERDEGO AERO contributing $200,000, but they do not appear to influence the bill's core objectives. Therefore, the risk of conflicts of interest is assessed as low, as the financial interests represented do not align with the legislative focus of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERDEGO AERO THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $200,000
SPRAY FOAM COALITION SPRAY FOAM COALITION $60,000
SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC $50,000
PELION VENTURE PARTNERS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $38,000
ANELLO PHOTONICS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $30,000
GREEN OCEANS EDNEXUS ADVISORS, LLC $22,500
47G THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
GRAIN CHAIN THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $5,000
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP undisclosed
RIDE GROUP LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
CRESCENTA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAPITOL CORE GROUP, INC. undisclosed
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP undisclosed
SPACECONNECT ASSOCIATION SALT POINT STRATEGIES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Bill Foster, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us