H.R. 9134

H.R. 9134: To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to ensure that personally identifiable information provided in the Free Application for Federal Student Aid is not used for immigration enforcement, and for other purposes.

Introduced Emily Randall (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9134 aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to protect personally identifiable information submitted in the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) from being used for immigration enforcement purposes. This means that information provided by students seeking federal financial aid cannot be accessed or utilized by immigration authorities to target individuals for immigration enforcement actions.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9134 argue that the bill is a crucial step in ensuring that undocumented students feel safe applying for financial aid without the fear of deportation. Advocates highlight that protecting student information encourages higher education access and equity, particularly for marginalized communities, and fosters an inclusive educational environment.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9134 express concerns that restricting the use of FAFSA information for immigration enforcement could undermine national security and public safety. Some opponents argue that the bill may incentivize illegal immigration by providing undocumented individuals with access to federal financial aid, potentially diverting resources away from citizens and lawful residents.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Education

The analysis of H.R. 9134, sponsored by Emily Randall, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill aims to protect personally identifiable information in the context of federal student aid from being used for immigration enforcement, which does not appear to intersect with the financial interests of the top donors listed. The lobbying activity in this policy area, totaling $410,500, is primarily from industries that do not directly relate to higher education or immigration enforcement. This lack of overlap suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest. Voters should be aware that while there is significant lobbying activity, it does not directly influence the bill's intent or provisions.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERDEGO AERO THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $200,000
SPRAY FOAM COALITION SPRAY FOAM COALITION $60,000
SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC $50,000
PELION VENTURE PARTNERS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $38,000
ANELLO PHOTONICS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $30,000
GREEN OCEANS EDNEXUS ADVISORS, LLC $22,500
47G THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
GRAIN CHAIN THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $5,000
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP undisclosed
RIDE GROUP LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
CRESCENTA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAPITOL CORE GROUP, INC. undisclosed
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP undisclosed
SPACECONNECT ASSOCIATION SALT POINT STRATEGIES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Emily Randall, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us