H.R. 9138

H.R. 9138: To require the Secretary of the Interior to transfer to the Secretary of the Navy administrative jurisdiction of certain land located on Adak Island, Alaska, and for other purposes.

Introduced Nicholas Begich (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9138 is a bill that requires the Secretary of the Interior to transfer control of specific land on Adak Island, Alaska, to the Secretary of the Navy. This transfer is likely intended to support military operations or other federal initiatives on the island.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised H.R. 9138 for potentially enhancing military readiness and operational capabilities in the region. Supporters argue that this transfer will facilitate better use of the land for defense purposes and strengthen national security.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9138 have raised concerns about the implications of the land transfer for local communities and environmental impacts. Some argue that the bill may prioritize military interests over conservation and local needs, leading to potential adverse effects on the ecosystem and indigenous rights.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

While there are no direct industry overlaps detected between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, the lobbying activity in the bill's policy area presents some potential conflicts of interest. Notably, BYD Motors, LLC and its subsidiaries contributed $20,000, and Quectel Wireless Solutions Co., Ltd. contributed $90,000. These companies are involved in technology and automotive sectors, which could have indirect interests in land use and development on Adak Island. The undisclosed lobbying activities from various entities, including VIFCARE and the Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska, further complicate the landscape, as the lack of transparency raises questions about their specific interests in this bill. Voters should be aware that while direct financial conflicts are not evident, the presence of significant lobbying and contributions from companies with potential stakes in land management could influence the bill's outcomes.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $140,000
QUECTEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS CO., LTD. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $90,000
CONNECTIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS MCDERMOTT+ LLC $60,000
CAMBER HEALTH MCDERMOTT+ LLC $50,000
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF WINEGRAPE GROWERS TORREY ADVISORY GROUP (FORMERLY MICHAEL TORREY ASSOCIATES, LLC) $50,000
BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES $20,000
PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC $20,000
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA - NUWEH MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
GREENPOWER BX LLC MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
CLARITY MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
ABRAWORKS LIMITED BURRELL INTERNATIONAL GROUP LLC undisclosed
THE PARTNERSHIP TO ADVANCE VIRTUAL CARE (PAVC) MCDERMOTT+ LLC undisclosed
MBDA INCORPORATED MBDA INCORPORATED undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Nicholas Begich, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us