H.R. 9153

H.R. 9153: To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025 to exempt certain military installations from guidance regarding the maintenance of the aggregate square footage of facilities of the Department of Defense.

Introduced Frank Lucas (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9153 aims to amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025 by exempting specific military installations from existing guidelines that regulate the total square footage of Department of Defense facilities. This change is likely intended to provide more flexibility in managing military infrastructure and resources.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9153 argue that the bill will allow military installations to better adapt to their unique needs, potentially improving operational efficiency and effectiveness. Proponents believe that this flexibility is essential for maintaining readiness and supporting the evolving requirements of the military.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9153 express concerns that exempting certain military installations from square footage regulations could lead to unchecked expansion and increased costs. They argue that this might undermine efforts to ensure accountability and efficiency in the management of Department of Defense facilities.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 9153 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Frank Lucas's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter concerning military installations. The lack of direct financial ties suggests that the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal. While there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, the undisclosed nature of the lobbying efforts makes it challenging to ascertain any direct influence on the bill. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not necessarily indicate a conflict unless there are clear financial connections to the bill's provisions.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
MANAGED FUNDS ASSOCIATION RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES VALENTINE STRATEGIES undisclosed
SAMSARA INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
OTG PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
BLOCKQUAKE HOLDINGS LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PAYSAFE MERCHANT SERVICES CORPORATION PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PROOF OF STAKE ALLIANCE PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SENTILINK CORP. PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
TEMPLUM LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OUISA CAPITAL LLC) PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
GLOBAL PRIMEX LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
WARRIOR TRADING PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SYNIVERSE TECHNOLOGIES LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Frank Lucas, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $480,000,000
Individuals: $480,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $150,000,000
Individuals: $150,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us