H.R. 9166

H.R. 9166: To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide for the refinancing of certain Federal student loans, and for other purposes.

Introduced Michael Turner (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9166 aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to allow borrowers to refinance certain federal student loans. This could potentially lower interest rates for those who qualify, making it easier for them to manage their student debt.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9166 have praised the bill for its potential to alleviate the financial burden on student loan borrowers, particularly those struggling with high interest rates. The refinancing option is seen as a step towards making higher education more accessible and affordable.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9166 argue that refinancing federal student loans could complicate the existing loan system and may not provide significant relief to borrowers. Some express concerns that the bill could lead to unintended consequences, such as increased debt for certain borrowers who may not fully understand the refinancing process.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Education

The analysis of H.R. 9166, aimed at refinancing Federal student loans, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor, Michael Turner, and his top donor industries. The lobbying activity associated with this bill primarily involves firms that do not appear to have a direct stake in higher education or student loan refinancing. For instance, significant contributions from Verdego Aero ($200,000) and Anello Photonics ($30,000) are related to aerospace and technology sectors, which do not directly influence the higher education landscape. Additionally, the total lobbying amounts from these industries do not indicate a concentrated effort to sway legislation in favor of student loan refinancing. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest is assessed as low, as there is no clear financial incentive for these donors to influence this particular bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERDEGO AERO THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $200,000
SPRAY FOAM COALITION SPRAY FOAM COALITION $60,000
SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC $50,000
PELION VENTURE PARTNERS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $38,000
ANELLO PHOTONICS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $30,000
GREEN OCEANS EDNEXUS ADVISORS, LLC $22,500
47G THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
GRAIN CHAIN THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $5,000
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP undisclosed
RIDE GROUP LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
CRESCENTA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAPITOL CORE GROUP, INC. undisclosed
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP undisclosed
SPACECONNECT ASSOCIATION SALT POINT STRATEGIES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Michael Turner, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us