H.R. 9167

H.R. 9167: To amend section 313 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to designate provisions resulting in the sale, disposal, or transfer of Federal lands as extraneous under the Byrd Rule.

Introduced Gabriel (Gabe) Vasquez (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9167 aims to amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 by designating provisions that involve the sale, disposal, or transfer of federal lands as extraneous under the Byrd Rule. This means that such provisions would not be allowed in budget reconciliation bills, which are subject to certain procedural rules in the Senate.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9167 argue that the bill is a necessary step to protect federal lands from being sold or transferred without thorough legislative scrutiny. They believe it reinforces the importance of maintaining public land for future generations and ensures that any significant changes to land management are debated openly.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9167 contend that the bill could hinder effective land management and limit the government's ability to respond to changing economic needs. They argue that it may prevent necessary sales or transfers of underutilized federal lands that could benefit local economies or facilitate public-private partnerships.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Economics and Public Finance

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of H.R. 9167, the lobbying activity in this area raises some concerns. Notably, Tencent America LLC and Alibaba Group Holding Limited have made significant contributions, totaling $280,000, through various lobbying firms. These companies are involved in technology and e-commerce, which may not have a direct connection to federal land management but could imply interests in broader regulatory frameworks that affect their operations. Voters should be aware that while the bill itself does not seem to directly benefit these donors, the influence of large donors in lobbying could create indirect pressures on legislative outcomes.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
TENCENT AMERICA, LLC BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP $200,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP $80,000
B&H FOTO & ELECTRONICS CORP STONINGTON GLOBAL $75,000
CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C. $60,000
NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC $10,000
SULLIVAN STRATEGIES OBO ODOT COLUMBIA STRATEGIC COUNSEL $10,000
ACT FOR AMERICA ACT FOR AMERICA $10,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
TENCENT AMERICA LLC MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
XTAR LLC THE MADISON GROUP undisclosed
ALLERGY & ASTHMA NETWORK ALLERGY & ASTHMA NETWORK undisclosed
ARDMORE CONSULTING GROUP, INC BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP undisclosed
T-MOBILE USA, INC. ALPINE ADVISORS undisclosed
AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. undisclosed
PLAYPOWER, INC. MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Gabriel (Gabe) Vasquez, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us