H.R. 9210

H.R. 9210: To amend title 28, United States Code, to establish certain requirements for compromise settlements between the President and the United States, and for other purposes.

Introduced Jamie Raskin (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9210 aims to amend Title 28 of the United States Code by establishing specific requirements for compromise settlements that involve the President and the United States. This could include guidelines on how settlements are reached, potentially enhancing transparency and accountability in negotiations between the executive branch and parties involved in legal disputes.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised H.R. 9210 for promoting transparency and accountability in the executive branch's legal dealings. Supporters argue that the bill could help ensure that settlements are made in the best interest of the public and that the process is more open to scrutiny.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9210 have raised concerns that the bill could hinder the President's ability to negotiate settlements effectively. Some argue that the requirements may complicate legal processes and lead to delays, potentially undermining the government's ability to resolve disputes efficiently.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Law

The analysis of H.R. 9210 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Jamie Raskin's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. Raskin's primary donors are from the health professionals sector, contributing a significant $120 million, and the retired sector, contributing $37.5 million. However, these industries do not appear to have a direct stake in the compromise settlements between the President and the United States as outlined in the bill. Additionally, while there is lobbying activity in the policy area, the lack of disclosed financial ties to Raskin's top donor industries further diminishes the potential for conflicts of interest. Voters should be aware that while there are substantial contributions from health professionals, they do not directly correlate with the legislative intent of this bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
MANAGED FUNDS ASSOCIATION RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES VALENTINE STRATEGIES undisclosed
SAMSARA INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
OTG PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
BLOCKQUAKE HOLDINGS LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PAYSAFE MERCHANT SERVICES CORPORATION PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PROOF OF STAKE ALLIANCE PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SENTILINK CORP. PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
TEMPLUM LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OUISA CAPITAL LLC) PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
GLOBAL PRIMEX LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
WARRIOR TRADING PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SYNIVERSE TECHNOLOGIES LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jamie Raskin, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us