H.R. 9215

H.R. 9215: To limit stock buybacks, shareholder dividends, and executive compensation for certain underperforming contractors as determined by the Secretary of Defense, and for other purposes.

Introduced Tim Burchett (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9215 aims to restrict stock buybacks, shareholder dividends, and executive compensation for defense contractors that are deemed underperforming by the Secretary of Defense. The bill seeks to ensure that taxpayer dollars are used effectively and that companies prioritize performance over financial maneuvers that benefit shareholders and executives.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9215 argue that it promotes accountability and responsible spending within the defense sector. They highlight that limiting financial rewards for underperforming contractors aligns with taxpayer interests and encourages companies to focus on improving their performance and delivering better services to the military.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9215 express concerns that the bill could stifle innovation and investment in the defense industry. They argue that limiting stock buybacks and executive compensation may deter top talent from entering the sector and could lead to a decrease in overall competitiveness among defense contractors.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, the lobbying activity in this policy area raises some concerns. For instance, Persistent Systems, LLC has contributed $60,000, and Altria Client Services has contributed $40,000. These companies may have interests that could be indirectly affected by legislation limiting stock buybacks and executive compensation. Additionally, the presence of undisclosed contributions from various organizations suggests that there may be hidden interests at play that could influence the bill's outcomes. Voters should be aware that while the bill aims to regulate underperforming contractors, the financial interests of lobbyists could potentially sway the legislative process.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY $144,981
PERSISTENT SYSTEMS, LLC PERSISTENT SYSTEMS, LLC $60,000
ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $40,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION $40,000
GOTRIANGLE MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $30,000
AFRICAN AMERICAN ALLIANCE OF CDFI CEOS MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $20,000
CITY OF GLADEWATER, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $12,000
CITY OF CRANDALL, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
NATIONAL SLEEP FOUNDATION SLEEP, INC. undisclosed
SLEEP, INC. SLEEP, INC. undisclosed
THE LIVINGSTON GROUP ON BEHALF OF INNOVATIVE VACCINE TECHNOLOGIES MAGILL ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF AMERICA, INC. MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) undisclosed
LUMBEE TRIBE HOLDINGS, INC. MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) undisclosed
CITY OF CLEVELAND, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
CITY OF RIO HONDO, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Tim Burchett, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us