H.R. 9219

H.R. 9219: To direct the Secretary of Defense to assess and address risks to fuel supply infrastructure supporting military installations in California and to improve the resilience of fuel supply chains critical to national defense.

Introduced Wesley Hunt (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9219 directs the Secretary of Defense to evaluate the vulnerabilities in the fuel supply infrastructure that supports military bases in California. The bill aims to enhance the resilience of these fuel supply chains, which are crucial for national defense operations.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9219 highlight its proactive approach to ensuring that military installations in California have a reliable and secure fuel supply. They argue that strengthening fuel infrastructure is vital for national security and operational readiness, especially in a region prone to natural disasters.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9219 express concerns about the potential costs associated with assessing and upgrading fuel supply infrastructure. Some argue that the bill may divert resources from other pressing defense needs and question whether it adequately addresses broader energy security issues beyond military installations.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 9219, which focuses on assessing and improving the resilience of fuel supply infrastructure for military installations in California, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Wesley Hunt's top donor industries. The primary lobbying activity in this policy area comes from various organizations, including Persistent Systems, LLC, which contributed $60,000, and Altria Client Services, which contributed $40,000. However, these contributions do not directly relate to fuel supply or military infrastructure, indicating a low likelihood of conflicts of interest arising from financial ties. Voters should be aware that while there is significant lobbying activity, the absence of direct industry overlaps suggests that the bill is not influenced by the financial interests of the sponsor's donors.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY $144,981
PERSISTENT SYSTEMS, LLC PERSISTENT SYSTEMS, LLC $60,000
ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $40,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION $40,000
GOTRIANGLE MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $30,000
AFRICAN AMERICAN ALLIANCE OF CDFI CEOS MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $20,000
CITY OF GLADEWATER, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $12,000
CITY OF CRANDALL, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
NATIONAL SLEEP FOUNDATION SLEEP, INC. undisclosed
SLEEP, INC. SLEEP, INC. undisclosed
THE LIVINGSTON GROUP ON BEHALF OF INNOVATIVE VACCINE TECHNOLOGIES MAGILL ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF AMERICA, INC. MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) undisclosed
LUMBEE TRIBE HOLDINGS, INC. MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) undisclosed
CITY OF CLEVELAND, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
CITY OF RIO HONDO, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Wesley Hunt, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us