H.R. 9221

H.R. 9221: To ensure access to certain public land, and for other purposes.

Introduced Mike Kennedy (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9221 is a bill aimed at ensuring that the public has access to specific public lands. This may involve provisions to maintain or improve access routes, protect recreational opportunities, or safeguard certain areas from restrictions that could limit public use.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9221 have praised the bill for promoting outdoor recreation and preserving public access to natural resources. They argue that it encourages community engagement with public lands and supports local economies through tourism and outdoor activities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9221 have raised concerns that the bill could lead to increased environmental degradation or conflicts over land use. Some environmental groups argue that unrestricted access might harm sensitive ecosystems and wildlife habitats, potentially undermining conservation efforts.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$1,260,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

The analysis of H.R. 9221, sponsored by Mike Kennedy, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter, which focuses on ensuring access to certain public land. The primary donor industries, Health Professionals and Retired, do not have a clear connection to public land access issues. The total contributions from these sectors amount to $1.26 billion, which is substantial but does not indicate a direct influence on the legislation at hand. Additionally, the lobbying activity related to this bill involves companies like Alibaba and Tencent, which are not connected to the sponsor's donor base. This lack of overlap suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest in this instance, as the financial interests of the donors do not appear to align with the objectives of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
TENCENT AMERICA, LLC BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP $200,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP $80,000
B&H FOTO & ELECTRONICS CORP STONINGTON GLOBAL $75,000
CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C. $60,000
NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC $10,000
SULLIVAN STRATEGIES OBO ODOT COLUMBIA STRATEGIC COUNSEL $10,000
ACT FOR AMERICA ACT FOR AMERICA $10,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
TENCENT AMERICA LLC MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
XTAR LLC THE MADISON GROUP undisclosed
ALLERGY & ASTHMA NETWORK ALLERGY & ASTHMA NETWORK undisclosed
ARDMORE CONSULTING GROUP, INC BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP undisclosed
T-MOBILE USA, INC. ALPINE ADVISORS undisclosed
AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. undisclosed
PLAYPOWER, INC. MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mike Kennedy, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $960,000,000
Individuals: $960,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $300,000,000
Individuals: $300,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us