H.R. 9227

H.R. 9227: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to incentivize the domestic production and use of permanent magnets, and for other purposes.

Introduced John Moolenaar (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9227 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide incentives for the domestic production and use of permanent magnets. This likely includes tax breaks or credits for manufacturers and users of permanent magnets, encouraging domestic industry growth and reducing reliance on foreign sources.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9227 have praised the bill for promoting domestic manufacturing and innovation in the permanent magnets sector, which is crucial for various industries, including renewable energy and electric vehicles. They argue that the bill could create jobs and enhance national security by reducing dependency on foreign supply chains.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9227 express concerns that the bill may favor certain industries over others, potentially leading to market distortions. Some argue that the incentives could contribute to increased government spending without guaranteeing a significant return on investment, questioning the effectiveness of such tax breaks in achieving the intended goals.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$210,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 9227, which aims to incentivize the domestic production and use of permanent magnets, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor, John Moolenaar's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. Moolenaar's largest donor industry is Health Professionals, contributing $160 million, followed by Retired individuals at $50 million. Since neither of these industries is directly related to the production or use of permanent magnets, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. Additionally, the lobbying activity related to this bill does not indicate significant financial influence from industries that would directly benefit from the legislation, further supporting a low risk assessment.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
HOGAN LOVELLS, LLP OBO ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT CO., LTD. MO STRATEGIES, INC. $530,000
TENCENT AMERICA LLC MO STRATEGIES, INC. $530,000
TENCENT AMERICA LLC HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP $410,000
BORDER TRADE ALLIANCE BC CONSULTING, LLC $60,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED MO STRATEGIES, INC. $60,000
FRESH PRODUCE ASSOCIATION OF THE AMERICAS BC CONSULTING, LLC $45,000
WERNER ENTERPRISES BC CONSULTING, LLC $45,000
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC. BC CONSULTING, LLC $45,000
NATIONAL TANK TRUCK CARRIER, INC. BC CONSULTING, LLC $37,500
STEVENS TRUCKING BC CONSULTING, LLC $30,000
NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION BC CONSULTING, LLC $22,500
STARR-CAMARGO BRIDGE COMPANY BC CONSULTING, LLC $15,000
STRAUNS CUSTOMHOUSE BROKERS, LLC BC CONSULTING, LLC $7,500
CLEAN FREIGHT COALITION MULLEN CONSULTING LLC undisclosed
CITY OF ASHEBORO CRANFILL SUMNER LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding John Moolenaar, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $160,000,000
Individuals: $160,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $50,000,000
Individuals: $50,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us