H.R. 9231

H.R. 9231: To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to deem certain substances to be unsafe for use as food contact substances, and for other purposes.

Introduced Janice Schakowsky (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9231 aims to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to classify certain substances as unsafe for use in food contact materials. This means that the bill seeks to restrict or ban the use of specific chemicals or materials that could potentially leach into food and pose health risks to consumers.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9231 argue that the bill is a crucial step towards ensuring food safety and protecting public health. They praise the legislation for prioritizing consumer safety and taking proactive measures to eliminate harmful substances from the food supply.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9231 express concerns that the bill may impose unnecessary restrictions on manufacturers and could lead to increased costs for food producers. Some argue that the legislation might stifle innovation in food packaging and create challenges for businesses that rely on specific materials deemed unsafe.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of H.R. 9231, sponsored by Janice Schakowsky, indicates no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter regarding food contact substances and the sponsor's top donor industries. While there is lobbying activity in the policy area, the contributions from entities such as Monroe Energy, LLC ($10,000) and Upstate Niagara Cooperative, Inc. ($10,000) do not directly correlate with the bill's focus on food safety regulations. The lobbying contributions appear to be from organizations with broader interests rather than specific ties to the bill's provisions. Therefore, the potential for conflicts of interest remains low, as the financial support does not suggest a direct influence on the legislative outcome regarding food safety.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $12,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
FRIENDS OF FATHER JUDGE HIGH SCHOOL, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $6,000
ARSENAL ASSOCIATES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Janice Schakowsky, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us