H.R. 9235

H.R. 9235: To amend title 23, United States Code, to require an identification of natural disaster vulnerability in certain transportation plans, and for other purposes.

Introduced George Whitesides (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9235 aims to amend existing transportation legislation by requiring that certain transportation plans identify vulnerabilities related to natural disasters. This means that when transportation agencies develop plans, they must consider how natural disasters could impact their infrastructure and services.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9235 have praised the bill for its proactive approach to enhancing the resilience of transportation systems against natural disasters. They argue that by identifying vulnerabilities, communities can better prepare for and mitigate the effects of disasters, ultimately saving lives and reducing economic losses.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9235 have raised concerns about the potential costs and bureaucratic burdens associated with implementing the new requirements. Some argue that the bill could divert resources from other critical transportation projects, leading to delays and inefficiencies in infrastructure development.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 9235, sponsored by George Whitesides, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill focuses on identifying natural disaster vulnerabilities in transportation plans, which does not appear to directly benefit any specific donor industries. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes contributions from various organizations, such as Monroe Energy, LLC and Upstate Niagara Cooperative, Inc., each contributing $10,000. However, these contributions do not indicate a direct conflict with the bill's objectives. Overall, the lack of direct industry overlap suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $12,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
FRIENDS OF FATHER JUDGE HIGH SCHOOL, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $6,000
ARSENAL ASSOCIATES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding George Whitesides, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us