H.R. 9245

H.R. 9245: To establish a grant program supporting teacher and school leader induction programs in public schools, and for other purposes.

Introduced Jahana Hayes (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9245 aims to create a grant program that supports the induction of new teachers and school leaders in public schools. This program is designed to enhance the onboarding process for these educators, helping them transition into their roles more effectively and ultimately improving educational outcomes in schools.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9245 have praised the bill for its potential to improve teacher retention and effectiveness by providing necessary resources and support during the critical early stages of a teacher's career. Many believe that investing in induction programs will lead to better educational experiences for students and a stronger educational workforce overall.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9245 have raised concerns about the allocation of funds and whether the grant program will effectively address the challenges faced by educators. Some argue that the bill may divert resources from other critical areas in education or that it lacks sufficient accountability measures to ensure the success of the induction programs.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Education

The analysis of H.R. 9245, which aims to establish a grant program for teacher and school leader induction programs, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Jahana Hayes' top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in education or teacher training, suggesting a low risk of conflicts of interest. Furthermore, while there is significant lobbying activity in the education sector, the amounts from these entities do not directly correlate with the bill's objectives, indicating that the financial influences may not be aligned with the legislative intent. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not necessarily indicate a conflict in this specific case.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SASOL CHEMICALS USA LLC SASOL CHEMICALS USA LLC $260,000
ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL FKA MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION ZIEBART CONSULTING, LLC $60,000
ORGANIC PRODUCE ASSOCIATION THE RUSSELL GROUP, INC. $50,000
GRAVITICS TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL INC VENABLE LLP $30,000
CITY OF WILLISTON (ND) NEXXUS CONSULTING, LLC $30,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS $28,000
S&P GLOBAL F/K/A IHS MARITIME & TRADE VENABLE LLP $20,000
TOWN OF TUSAYAN NEXXUS CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE $5,000
NATIONAL RELIGIOUS BROADCASTERS NATIONAL RELIGIOUS BROADCASTERS undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRIES, INC. VENABLE LLP undisclosed
ARISTEIA STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC ARISTEIA STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC undisclosed
US CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGIES ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (DBA SILBEY STRATEGIES) undisclosed
CX2 ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (DBA SILBEY STRATEGIES) undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jahana Hayes, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us