H.R. 9254

H.R. 9254: To specify that the Southern Poverty Law Center shall not be treated as described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Introduced Chip Roy (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9254 aims to clarify that the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) should not be classified as a tax-exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. This classification typically allows organizations to receive tax-deductible contributions, so the bill may impact the SPLC's funding and operational capabilities.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the bill argue that it promotes accountability and transparency regarding organizations that engage in political and social advocacy. They assert that the SPLC's labeling of certain groups as hate organizations is controversial and that this legislation could lead to a more balanced approach to tax-exempt status.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the bill contend that it is an attack on the SPLC, which plays a vital role in monitoring hate groups and promoting civil rights. They argue that the legislation could undermine the SPLC's ability to operate effectively and may be seen as a politically motivated effort to silence organizations that challenge extremist views.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 9254, sponsored by Chip Roy, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. While there is lobbying activity in the policy area, the contributions from entities like Monroe Energy, LLC ($10,000), Upstate Niagara Cooperative, Inc. ($10,000), and Agri-Mark, Inc. ($10,000) do not present a clear conflict with the bill's intent to specify the treatment of the Southern Poverty Law Center under the Internal Revenue Code. The total lobbying contributions from these entities amount to $30,000, which is relatively modest in the context of campaign finance. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest appears low as the financial interests represented do not directly correlate with the bill's focus on nonprofit tax treatment.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
FCA INTERNATIONAL OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $25,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $12,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Chip Roy, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us