H.R. 9255

H.R. 9255: To establish requirements with respect to the sale of timeshares to improve acquisition transparency, and for other purposes.

Introduced Glenn Thompson (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9255 aims to create new requirements for the sale of timeshares, focusing on improving transparency for consumers during the acquisition process. This may include clearer information about costs, terms, and conditions associated with timeshare purchases, ultimately helping buyers make more informed decisions.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9255 have praised the bill for enhancing consumer protection and transparency in the timeshare market. They argue that clearer guidelines will help prevent misleading sales practices and empower consumers, leading to a more trustworthy industry.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9255 have expressed concerns that the new requirements may impose excessive regulations on the timeshare industry, potentially leading to increased costs for consumers and limiting options in the market. Some argue that the bill could stifle innovation and competition among timeshare sellers.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Commerce

The analysis of H.R. 9255 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Glenn Thompson's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter concerning timeshare sales. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes contributions from various organizations, such as Monroe Energy, LLC, which donated $10,000, and Upstate Niagara Cooperative, Inc., which also contributed $10,000. However, these organizations do not appear to have a direct stake in timeshare sales, indicating a low risk of conflict of interest. The undisclosed amounts from other lobbyists further complicate the picture but do not suggest a direct connection to the bill's focus on acquisition transparency in timeshares. Voters should be aware that while there are significant contributions from lobbyists, they do not align closely with the bill's objectives.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
FCA INTERNATIONAL OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $25,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $12,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
FRIENDS OF FATHER JUDGE HIGH SCHOOL, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $6,000
LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Glenn Thompson, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $640,000,000
Individuals: $640,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $200,000,000
Individuals: $200,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us