H.R. 9257

H.R. 9257: To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require group health plans and health insurance issuers offering group or individual health in

Introduced Lauren Underwood (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9257, titled the 'Great Bend of the Gila National Monument Establishment Act,' was introduced in the House of Representatives on August 2, 2024, by Representative Raúl M. Grijalva. The bill aims to establish the Great Bend of the Gila National Monument in Arizona, thereby protecting and preserving the area's natural and cultural resources. As of its introduction, the bill was referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources. ([congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/9257?utm_source=openai))

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has highlighted the bill's potential to safeguard significant archaeological sites and promote tourism in the region. Supporters argue that establishing the monument would protect the area's unique landscapes and cultural heritage, benefiting both the environment and local economies.

Negative Media Summary

Critics have expressed concerns that designating the area as a national monument could impose restrictions on land use, potentially affecting local industries such as mining and agriculture. Some stakeholders worry about the federal government's increased role in land management and the possible economic implications for communities dependent on resource extraction.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

While there are no direct industry overlaps detected between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, there is notable lobbying activity in the health policy area. For instance, SASOL CHEMICALS USA LLC has contributed $260,000, which could indicate a vested interest in health-related legislation. Additionally, the Organic Produce Association's $50,000 contribution suggests a potential influence in health and nutrition-related discussions. Although these contributions do not directly conflict with the bill's intent, they raise questions about the broader implications of donor interests in health policy. Voters should be aware of these connections as they may influence legislative outcomes.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SASOL CHEMICALS USA LLC SASOL CHEMICALS USA LLC $260,000
ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL FKA MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION ZIEBART CONSULTING, LLC $60,000
ORGANIC PRODUCE ASSOCIATION THE RUSSELL GROUP, INC. $50,000
GRAVITICS TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL INC VENABLE LLP $30,000
CITY OF WILLISTON (ND) NEXXUS CONSULTING, LLC $30,000
S&P GLOBAL F/K/A IHS MARITIME & TRADE VENABLE LLP $20,000
TOWN OF TUSAYAN NEXXUS CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE $5,000
NATIONAL RELIGIOUS BROADCASTERS NATIONAL RELIGIOUS BROADCASTERS undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRIES, INC. VENABLE LLP undisclosed
ARISTEIA STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC ARISTEIA STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC undisclosed
US CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGIES ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (DBA SILBEY STRATEGIES) undisclosed
CX2 ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (DBA SILBEY STRATEGIES) undisclosed
FISICA ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (DBA SILBEY STRATEGIES) undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Lauren Underwood, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us