H.R. 9258

H.R. 9258: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to impose a mileage-based user fee for mobile mounted concrete boom pumps in lieu of the tax on taxable fuels, and for other purposes.

Introduced Rudy Yakym (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9258 proposes to change the tax structure for mobile mounted concrete boom pumps by introducing a mileage-based user fee instead of the existing tax on fuels. This means that operators of these concrete pumps would pay based on the distance traveled rather than the amount of fuel consumed.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised H.R. 9258 for its innovative approach to taxing mobile mounted concrete boom pumps, arguing that a mileage-based user fee could lead to fairer taxation based on actual usage. They highlight that this could reduce the financial burden on operators who may not use their equipment extensively.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9258 have raised concerns about the potential administrative burden of tracking mileage for concrete boom pump operators. Some media reports suggest that this change could lead to increased costs for businesses and may disproportionately affect smaller operators who may struggle with the new fee structure.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 9258 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Rudy Yakym's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill, which focuses on imposing a mileage-based user fee for mobile mounted concrete boom pumps. While there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, with notable contributions such as $30,000 from the American Subcontractor Association and $20,000 from the American Council of Independent Laboratories, these entities do not directly correlate with the bill's specific focus on concrete boom pumps. The lack of direct financial ties suggests a lower risk of conflicts of interest, as the sponsor's donors are not directly benefiting from the proposed legislation. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, the absence of overlapping interests indicates that the bill may be more about policy than donor influence.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
FCA INTERNATIONAL OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $25,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $12,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION ASCEND CONSULTING $10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Rudy Yakym, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us