H.R. 9268

H.R. 9268: To amend the Bank Secrecy Act to require the registration of digital asset kiosk operators and to require such operators to comply with anti-money laundering and anti-fraud requirements, and for other purposes.

Introduced Sean Casten (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9268 aims to amend the Bank Secrecy Act by requiring operators of digital asset kiosks to register with authorities. Additionally, these operators will be mandated to follow anti-money laundering (AML) and anti-fraud regulations, ensuring that transactions conducted through these kiosks are monitored and compliant with existing financial laws.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9268 have praised the bill as a necessary step to enhance financial security and prevent illicit activities associated with digital assets. They argue that the registration and compliance requirements will help protect consumers and promote transparency in the rapidly evolving digital asset market.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9268 have expressed concerns that the new regulations may stifle innovation and create burdensome compliance costs for digital asset kiosk operators. Some argue that the bill could hinder the growth of the digital asset industry in the U.S. and limit access for consumers looking to utilize these services.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.R. 9268, which aims to amend the Bank Secrecy Act regarding digital asset kiosk operators, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Sean Casten's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in digital assets or the regulation of anti-money laundering and anti-fraud requirements. Furthermore, the lobbying activity related to this bill's policy area includes contributions from various health and infrastructure-related entities, which do not directly correlate with the digital asset industry. The largest single contribution in this context comes from Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, which contributed $60,000, but this does not suggest a direct conflict given the nature of the bill. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest is assessed as low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED MARSHALL & POPP, LLC $60,000
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC $60,000
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTH MCDERMOTT WILL & SCHULTE LLP $50,000
WAYFINDER GROUP (OBO RESEARCH CORPORATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII) RED MAPLE CONSULTING, LLC $40,000
FRONTIER INFRASTRUCTURE HOLDINGS LLC KOUNTOUPES DENHAM CARR & REID, LLC $30,000
ECKERD CONNECTS KOUNTOUPES DENHAM CARR & REID, LLC $30,000
SMART APPROACHES TO MARIJUANA OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. $20,000
FEDERATION OF ELECTRIC POWER COS OF JAPAN GEORGE H. DENISON $10,000
MAYO CLINIC MCDERMOTT WILL & SCHULTE LLP undisclosed
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
THE BIG 12 CONFERENCE, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
PAC-12 CONFERENCE MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Sean Casten, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us